misk@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 21 hours agoAI chatbots unable to accurately summarise news, BBC findswww.bbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square64fedilinkarrow-up1347arrow-down16cross-posted to: technology@zerobytes.monsterbbc@rss.ponder.cat
arrow-up1341arrow-down1external-linkAI chatbots unable to accurately summarise news, BBC findswww.bbc.commisk@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 21 hours agomessage-square64fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@zerobytes.monsterbbc@rss.ponder.cat
minus-squareRivalarrival@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down5·6 hours ago It found 51% of all AI answers to questions about the news were judged to have significant issues of some form. How good are the human answers? I mean, I expect that an AI’s error rate is currently higher than an “expert” in their field. But I’d guess the AI is quite a bit better than, say, the average Republican.
How good are the human answers? I mean, I expect that an AI’s error rate is currently higher than an “expert” in their field.
But I’d guess the AI is quite a bit better than, say, the average Republican.