thehatfox@lemmy.world to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoMicrosoft’s Activision Blizzard deal gets preliminary approval from UK regulatorwww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square47fedilinkarrow-up1143arrow-down15cross-posted to: xbox@lemmy.world
arrow-up1138arrow-down1external-linkMicrosoft’s Activision Blizzard deal gets preliminary approval from UK regulatorwww.theverge.comthehatfox@lemmy.world to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square47fedilinkcross-posted to: xbox@lemmy.world
minus-squareNeato@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 year agoWhy would they do that? CoD is a better investment. This is MS. Not some fan boy.
minus-squareLmaydev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·1 year agoThey need more games for their pass.
minus-squaretryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoBut do they need the games to be good? Activions sucks balls, but why would microsoft make the games good again and remove all the shit with microtransactions etc.?
minus-squareNOT_RICK@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoIf the games are good and non-exploitative it would in theory drive up Game Pass subscriptions.
Why would they do that? CoD is a better investment. This is MS. Not some fan boy.
They need more games for their pass.
But do they need the games to be good? Activions sucks balls, but why would microsoft make the games good again and remove all the shit with microtransactions etc.?
If the games are good and non-exploitative it would in theory drive up Game Pass subscriptions.