• Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    A public traded company has way more transparency, I have no idea why you believe privately held companies would be in any way better.

    The problem is often when the original founder of a private company leaves, the company loses its roots and by that its reason to exist. And those two often go together.

    • just_another_person@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      Only more transparency in the fiduciary sense, which only really helps shareholders. All companies are still required to follow any regulatory disclosures, which generally benefits the public and users.

      Valve has only gotten to where they are being on the pulse of the gaming community, and being agile to adapt to those needs. Publicly traded companies only care about profits and shareholders by contract. That’s kind of their job once they go public. Very few buck that trend.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes you are somewhat right. But IMO Valve is what it is because of Gabe Newell, private or public is not the determining factor.

        When Gabe Newell at some point leaves Valve, the company will change, no matter if it stays private or goes public.