• MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    ·
    10 months ago

    Looks interesting, although the comments about other git repo services being bloated, complicated, and resource heavy, followed by a paragraph about AI features that have been added, with more planned in the future, seems a touch ironic to me.

    • StarDreamer@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Isn’t the whole point of these things the “bloated” (CI/CD, issue tracker, merge requests, mirroring, etc) part? Otherwise we’d all be using bare git repos over ssh (which works great btw!)

      It’s like complaining about IDE bloat while not using a text editor. Or complaining there’s too many knives in a knife set instead of buying just the chef knife.

  • Cam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Gitea and Forgejo are the way to go. Especially Forgejo which is working on federation just like Lemmy but for Forgejo repos and instances.

  • qnick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    Nobody name their new product Gitler for some reason. Such a good name.

  • Anafroj@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    9 months ago

    There hasn’t been a new Git repo launch in almost a decade

    Am I the only person annoyed they seem to mistake repositories for forges? It’s already annoying when casual users say “git” for “GitHub”, but those guys actually want to build a forge, explaining they’re going to do better than anyone else. Maybe start by properly using the terms?

    • Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      9 months ago

      Here I am knowing the difference between git and GitHub, GitLab, …

      But what’s a ‘forge’ please ?

      • Anafroj@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        That’s the name we use to designate software like GitHub, GitLab and similar, which provide repositories hosting and tooling like issue trackers. It’s supposed to be named like that because of SourceForge, the oldest of such tools, although I didn’t hear the term “forge” before the last 5 years or so, long after SourceForge demise, so I imagine there is a bit of nostalgia in this name (not sure who is nostalgic of SourceForge, though 😂). The wikipedia page : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forge_(software)

    • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      Also plain wrong - Codeberg launched in 2019. Now the question is: did the author just not know better, or is he paid not to know?

      • Anafroj@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        The worst part is that this is a direct quote from Harness’ CEO, not from TechCrunch author. :) Maybe they have a great product, I don’t know, but it certainly feels like an amateurish launch. :D

    • kinttach@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      And of course there have been forges launched, including SourceHut, Gitea, Gogs, Forgejo…

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I complained when the term “crypto” was co-opted. Come die with me on this hill where we care about things.

  • YawnTor@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    10 months ago

    Seems fast compared to self-hosted GitLab or Bitbucket. I don’t see a way to add an ssh key or gpg key for code signing. No dark mode so expect to burn your retinas out in the middle of the night. I’ll wait until it’s a little more fleshed out before thinking about replacing Gitea in my network, though.

      • rho50@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I found it much more barebones in my tinkering. It doesn’t seem to support pulling via SSH (and definitely doesn’t support signing commits). Configuration options appear extremely limited, both in documentation and the UI.

        It looks nice, but I don’t really see the point to it when Gitea Actions is now a thing. Gitea is a more mature product, and is similarly fast and lightweight.

        Edit: s/Gitea/Forgejo. Gitea has moved to a for-profit model since I made this comment.

        • macallik@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Gotcha. Thanks for sharing. I ended up install forgejo yesterday but Gitea will be my next option if I encounter any issues

  • Mario1159@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 months ago

    Does someone have a link to an instance to view? I don’t get why their code is hosted on Github

  • megaman@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    i’m not finding a way to prevent creating users right now… i’m just able to register new users again and again on the docker run. maybe i’m just missing the config (the documentation is looking like it needs to be fleshed out).

    not really trying to anyone with the url make an account on my basement computer…