• WarmSoda@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    And Starfield is more than twice that. It’s ridiculous.
    There’s no reason for it.

    • TrustingZebra@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Starfield is pretty huge though isn’t it? I dunno, it feels like if any games should take that much storage space, it’s a massive space game.

    • Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do you have like solid number of reasonable gigabytes a game can be? How did you arrive to this number exactly?

      • GreenMario@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        You don’t uNdERstAnD, a game must be less than 1GB in size or it’s unOpTiMiZeD.

        But at the same time, man I’m sick of these last gen/old non raytracing cards are holding us back! Where are my rig melting next gen games?!?! Oh wait I have to download 100GB and still turn down settings to High!?!? unOpTiMiZeD!! furiously leaves bad steam review