California cannot ban gun owners from having detachable magazines that hold more than 10 rounds, a federal judge ruled Friday.

The decision from U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez won’t take effect immediately. California Attorney General Rob Bonta, a Democrat, has already filed a notice to appeal the ruling. The ban is likely to remain in effect while the case is still pending.

This is the second time Benitez has struck down California’s law banning certain types of magazines. The first time he struck it down — way back in 2017 — an appeals court ended up reversing his decision.

  • thepianistfroggollum@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    We’re talking magazines, not full guns. Magazines are very simple, mechanically. And a properly calibrated 3D printer has very tight tolerances.

    Plus, you can buy a 3D printer for like $100 that does well enough to make one.

    • blazera@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And a properly calibrated 3D printer has very tight tolerances

      Mmm no they dont. Resin print maybe, but thats just gonna shatter.

      • thepianistfroggollum@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I have no idea why you think a resin printed magazine would shatter.

        Do you know what a magazine is?

        Also, I own a cheap 3D printer that would have absolutely no trouble printing a magazine

        • blazera@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Cus ive done a lot of resin printing. Its a pretty brittle material not used for making parts for anything. Hell even a resin printed scope would probably shatter just from recoil.

          I think your printed magazine would jam