• totallynotfbi@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      This week, TON Foundation announced that it’s forged a partnership with Tencent Cloud, which has “already successfully supported TON validators and plans to expand its services further to help meet TON’s high compute intensity and network bandwidth needs.” Validators, in web3 lingo, are participants that help authenticate transactions in a blockchain network.

      It looks like the partnership with Tencent only extends to their Web3 blockchain thing, and there doesn’t seem to be any partnership in the main app so it’s not the end of the world - at least, for now.

      Also, what even is this TON blockchain? I never knew Telegram had anything to do with crypto :/

      • fruitleatherpostcard@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, nah. Anything the CCP can slip it’s slimy festering little dick into, it will.

        There’s no way in hell that Telegram is secure.

        • totallynotfbi@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I guess, but I don’t see how much they can really influence Telegram without any stake in the app itself. They only seem to have a deal for cloud-hosting with the TON Foundation, a non-critical part of the app, and even that appears to be non-exclusive. So if Tencent tries to force a bad decision onto Telegram, what’s stopping them from severing ties and moving everything over to another provider?

          Of course, we don’t know what the situation will be like in the future, but at this present moment, I don’t think Telegram’s security has been breached by this. (Also I think you triple-posted this comment)

      • jivandabeast@lemmy.browntown.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Am also gonna stick with signal, eyeing up matrix. But what issues? The only reason i haven’t tested it out yet is none of my friends seem too keen on trying it.

        • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          For a lack of a better term: jank. Too much jank. For one instance, I have never seen in Whatsapp or Signal the phrase “unable to decrypt message”. I can deal with that personally, but >90% of the people I need to communicate to with messengers will drop a service and never look back if they see that.

      • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        We have chat standard called XMPP created by literially the same org that makes standards for Internet and Email.

        And there are other public protocols to choose from.

        • TheEntity@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Unfortunately XMPP died roughly when the mobile devices became a mainstay. The way Google de facto took over the protocol didn’t help either, but even without it XMPP isn’t fit for the mobile-first world. The client needs to maintain an active connection at all times and there is nothing akin to push messaging, causing quite a significant battery drain. I might be unaware of some progress in this regard but this is how I remember it.