• robo
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator

        • philomory@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          The thing is, it’s not an argument (at least, in the context of this comic), it’s a joke. It’s not intended to stand up to scrutiny, it’s intended to humorously contrast with your expectations (which, whether it succeeds or not is really a matter of opinion - I happen to kinda like it).

    • philomory@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I never said the banker created the threat of poverty, indeed, I never even said I agreed with the premise of the comic. “Philosophy cop” is supposed to be a cop, why would you be surprised that he tries to arrest someone on shaky grounds? That happens even in real life, non-joke contexts. Honestly, if you try to take the comic seriously rather than as a joke, the more surprising element would be that the cop was not only called out by internal affairs, but purportedly should expect to be punished for his misdeeds.