To be clear, I’m not complaining that we don’t have these aforementioned applications on the Linux desktop. That’s not the point. The point is “we” still don’t have a robust way for developers to monetise their application development work.

Most desktop Linux users run Ubuntu. Followed by others you’ve likely heard of like Arch, Fedora, Manjaro, SUSE and friends. Most users of these desktop Linux distributions have no baked-in way to buy software.

Similarly developers have no built-in route to market their wares to Linux desktop users. Having a capability to easily charge users to access software is a compelling argument to develop and market applications.

For sure, I can (and do) throw money at a patreon, paypal, ko-fi or buy a developer some coffee, beer or something from their Amazon wishlist. But I can’t just click “Buy” and “Install” on an app in a store on my Linux laptop.

Maybe one day all the ducks will be in a row, and I’ll be able to buy applications published for Linux, directly on my desktop. Until then, I’ll just keep looking longingly at those macOS app developers, and hoping.

  • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ubuntu Snap comes close to what OP described, and so do npm, apt etc. They need to realize that the terminal is not an enemy. Text output makes it easier to resolve issues than “install failed” you get in many commercial app stores.

    • christophski
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Did you read the article? It’s about being able to buy and sell apps, not just about installing them.

      • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Most are FOSS so that’s not required. Man pages and readmes usually specify the project website where a “Donate” link is.