Meta sparks privacy fears after unveiling $299 Smart Glasses with hidden cameras: ‘You can now film everyone without them knowing’::These stylish shades may look like a regular pair of Ray-Ban Wayfarers, but they’re actually Meta’s new Smart Glasses, complete with two tiny cameras and speakers implanted in the arms. The wearable tech was unveiled by Mark Zuckerberg Wednesday at the 2023 Meta Connect conference in Menlo Park, California, sparking a frenzy online.

    • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Perhaps one of the biggest advances in human knowledge is in how to make ultra-slick slippy-slopes for abstract ideas. It seems to me that the most common reason people give for accepting some new bullshit is that we already have some other bullshit which is worse. But it is the accumulation of additional bullshit that has gotten us into this mess. I’m referring mostly to sacrifices of privacy; and to loss of freedom of use in products and software; the ownership being replaced with ongoing fees and subscriptions. That kind of thing.

  • Bernie Ecclestoned@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I remember when Google glasses came out, people got assaulted for wearing them

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/san-francisco-woman-says-she-was-attacked-for-wearing-google-glass/

    Her Facebook post 💀

    “OMG so you’ll never believe this but… I got verbally and physically assaulted and robbed last night in the city, had things thrown at me because of some ---- Google Glass haters,” Slocum posted to Facebook.

          • erwan@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The Meta smart glasses have a LED, and they claim to detect when it’s covered and asked the user to clear it (not activating the camera) when it’s the case.

            But honestly, there are already devices to record people without their consent. Just go to AliExpress and you’ll find devices that don’t even bother adding a LED (because the whole point of the device is stealth filming).

          • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Next up: a bunch of facebook.posts on how to kill the recording.lights without damaging the glasses…

    • Nightwatch Admin@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The trick is now you can’t tell. Should it be illegal? Heck yes. Will it? “Hmm … technology, so important … innovation… privacy is dead anyway …. terrorism prevention… “

      • dependencyInjection@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why should it be illegal?

        It’s perfectly legal to photograph strangers in public. You’re in public you have no reasonable expectation of privacy.

        I don’t see people assaulting CCTV cameras for instance.

        Sure some weirdos might I use it for nefarious reasons but if it didn’t exist they would still be weirdos using something else.

        • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          People wear their glasses everywhere, including a variety of places where there is an expectation of privacy or where it is otherwise prohibited to record. Places where you would not be allowed to hold up your phone or camera and take photos.

          The introduction of tech that makes it impossible to distinguish between someone minding their own business and someone recording you demands a change to the legal framework. It doesn’t make sense to hold to laws that were written for an entirely different scenario.

          I don’t see people assaulting CCTV cameras for instance

          I’ve seen that fairly often, particularly around political protests, and I’ve never seen a CCTV camera in a public bathroom, locker room, etc.

          This tech is an inevitability and the potential legitimate uses are too valuable to ban it outright. But that doesn’t mean it should be treated exactly like a highly-visible camera or cell phone.

  • Chaotic Entropy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    I can’t imagine being friends or even acquaintances with a person who would want to live stream their POV as a day to day activity.

    • Zetta@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wouldn’t either, although I can see the appeal for moment capture and some of the other cool features.

      However I would never even consider this product, because it’s meta spyware garbage.

  • BreakDecks@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    Incredibly funny to see the NY Post pretend that these glasses were just now “unveiled”. This line of camera-equipped glasses has been around for 2 years now.

    • seitanic@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not funny. It’s predictable. They’re reporting it because Meta did it. Any time a large corporation does anything, it’s NEWS.

  • EstT@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    ‘You can now film everyone without them knowing’ Implying that we dont already have cameras always with us, and can perfectly do that.

    • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah I’m confused. I can already do this and no one notices. Start a stream on my iPhone, slip it into my shirt pocket with the camera facing forward. Never had anyone complain, and it’s easier to talk to my spouse about what they want from the store.

    • Buttons@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      A bunch of corporations been recording me and using my data for their own gain for a decade. Now you tell me some normie is going to record me? Do I care?

  • Steeve@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Hidden cameras? They’ve got big ol fuckin cameras on them and apparently a red LED that lights up when in use lol. It’d be easier to secretly film someone by pretending you’re texting on your phone. More ragebait.

    • orizuru@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I imagine it wouldn’t take long until someone finds a way to disable that LED.

  • HurlingDurling@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    My cyberpunk future of me using a full head mask every time I’m out in public is getting closer.

    • JaddedFauceet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s the thumbnail provided by the article, found inside the html

      meta property="og:image" content="https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/09/meta-glasses-comp.jpg?quality=75&strip=all&w=1024"