boem@lemmy.world to science@lemmy.world · 1 year agoAntimatter falls down, not up: CERN experiment confirms theorywww.nature.comexternal-linkmessage-square16fedilinkarrow-up135arrow-down10cross-posted to: news@kbin.socialphysics@mander.xyzscience@lemmy.ml
arrow-up135arrow-down1external-linkAntimatter falls down, not up: CERN experiment confirms theorywww.nature.comboem@lemmy.world to science@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square16fedilinkcross-posted to: news@kbin.socialphysics@mander.xyzscience@lemmy.ml
minus-squareBipta@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down2·1 year agoCharge isn’t the right word, although I’m not sure what the right word is. Otherwise you’ve got it right.
minus-squareLanternEverywhere@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoNo, charge is the right word. But i was wrong about charge being the only difference, apparently antimatter’s “parity” and “time” are also opposite of normal matter. Whatever that means. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antimatter
Charge isn’t the right word, although I’m not sure what the right word is. Otherwise you’ve got it right.
No, charge is the right word. But i was wrong about charge being the only difference, apparently antimatter’s “parity” and “time” are also opposite of normal matter. Whatever that means.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antimatter