California will double the taxes on guns and ammunition and use the money to pay for more security at public schools and various violence prevention programs under a new law Gov. Gavin Newsom signed Tuesday.

The federal government already taxes the sale of guns and ammunition at either 10% or 11%, depending on the type of gun. The law Newsom signed adds another 11% tax on top of that — making it the only state with its own tax on guns and ammunition, according to the gun control advocacy group Brady.

Newsom — a potential Democratic candidate for president beyond 2024 — has a reputation as one of the country’s most liberal governors. But he has often refused to raise taxes, even for causes he supports like combating climate change.

But it would have been difficult for Newsom to veto this tax increase, given his outspoken support for gun restrictions at the state and national level. Newsom is in the middle of a national campaign to amend the U.S. Constitution to restrict gun sales to people over 21, require extensive background checks, impose a waiting period for purchases and ban the sale of assault-style weapons. Restrictions like that are in place in some states, but not in the Constitution.

  • Jeremy [Iowa]@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I see Newsom is going for the “stricken down as unconstitutional” high score. I wonder how long it’ll be until we see this one going to Benitez…

    • treefrog@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The feds tax 10% according to the blurb posted with the article. So I fail to see how a state doing it infringes on 2A unless the tax is unreasonably high.

      Which it’s not.

  • BaroqueInMind@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m pro gun and pro military.

    I think this bill is genius and I am okay with paying more on my ammo and guns to fund anything related to public schools.

    • SHOW_ME_YOUR_ASSHOLE@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I disagree on the grounds that it prices out poor people. The 2nd amendment is for everyone and it shouldn’t be prohibitively expensive to exercise your right to bear arms.

      It’s already expensive to train and increasing that cost means more people won’t be able to train appropriately. Personally I’d prefer firearms training to be as cheap as possible so that anyone who chooses to own a gun can practice and be safe with it.

      • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        According to you people the Second Amendment says nothing about Regulation but says everything about the price point guns should be sold at.

  • rayyyy@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    If Newsom is going to tax guns let it be on handguns and Ar-15 style weapons since they are primarily used in attacks and mass shootings. Most sportsmen, and the general public will be more tolerate of this. Gong too far will cost too much political capital.

    • Melkath@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I love how “BuT tHeN tHeY wIlL jUsT uSe KnIvEs” rhetoric gets abandoned and a whole new more sophisticated ability to negotiate shows up AFTER effective action is taken.