• zephyreks@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It did not collect information. You’re hallucinating statements that don’t exist and you’re also hallucinating propagandists that don’t exist.

    I’d ask you to get it checked out, but I’m afraid that you’d hallucinate a doctor that doesn’t exist.

    • USNewsJunkie@newsie.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      @zephyreks There you go again. You’re either blatantly trying to mislead people or you’re an idiot.

      "But “it has been our assessment now that it did not collect while it was transiting the United States or over flying the United States”.

      He said the efforts the US took to mitigate any intelligence gathering “contributed” to the balloon’s failure to gather sensitive information."

      https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-66062562

      • zephyreks@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m seriously confused where you get your impression from. It’s been known that lead exposure leads to hallucinations, so you might want to get your paint checked out?

        • USNewsJunkie@newsie.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          @zephyreks You could only be seriously confused about where I get my “impression” from if you’re an absolute idiot considering I included the link to the BBC article where I got that “impression”.

          Yeah, we agree that it was not collected. But, you keep leaving out the part about where they tried. Make sure you put that in your talking points next time. They tried but failed. Ergo, they did not collect any intelligence.

          • zephyreks@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Nowhere in the article does it say that they tried.

            I’m like legitimately worried for you. Lead contamination is a serious problem.

              • zephyreks@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Last I checked, the Pentagon falls higher on the scale of “reliable statements by government” than some random General.

                • USNewsJunkie@newsie.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  @zephyreks dude I don’t know any other way to explain it to you so that you can comprehend it. The balloon was trying to collect information and was thwarted. You have it from a brigadier general that mitigation efforts certainly contributed to the balloon not collecting any information. You can try and act like it was just not collecting information out of the goodness of the Chinese’s heart, but that is a blatant misrepresentation of fact.

                  • zephyreks@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Not according to the Pentagon, which last I checked was a more reliable source than a single General. A General can say whatever they want, but the Pentagon has to actually check facts.