• CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fundamentally, anything humans can do can be done by physical systems of some kind, (because humans are already such a system), so given enough time I’d bet that it would be eventually possible to make a machine do literally anything that can be done by a human. There might be some things that nobody ever does get an AI to replicate even if technically possible though, just because of not having a motivation to

  • Riskable@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Since AI is trained by us, using the fruit of human labor as input, it’ll have to be something we can’t train it to do.

    Something biological or instinctual… Like being in close proximity to an AI will never result in synchronized menstruation since an AI can’t and won’t ever menstruate.

    So… That 👍

  • kromem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    An exact 1:1 realtime copy of itself emulated within a simulated universe.

    Pretty much everything else mentioned in this thread falls into the “never say never” category.

        • noli@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you actually read the article, it doesn’t say anything about being able to solve the halting problem. It used the undecidability of the halting problem to prove equivalence of another class of problems to the halting problem.

          • kromem@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Which is why I said it was still a “never say never” and not an already solved problem.

            The halting problem is impossible for Turing machines, but if hypercomputation ends up possible, it isn’t impossible.

            For example, an oracle machine as proposed by Turing, or a ‘real’ computer using actual real values.

            The latter in particular may even end up a thing in the not too distant future assuming neural networks continue to move into photonics in such a way that networks run while internals are never directly measured. In that case the issue would be verifying the result - the very topic of the paper in question.

            Effectively, while it is proven that we can never be able to directly measure a solution to the halting problem, I wouldn’t take a bet that within my lifetime we won’t have ended up being able to indirectly measure a solution to the problem and directly validate the result.

    • NateNate60@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Computers will never consistently beat humans and humans will never consistently beat computers as snakes and ladders.

      Or rock-paper-scissors, for that matter.

  • imgprojts@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Giving everyone money for free from the rich people! Yeah, that’s right… wealth redistribution! AI won’t ever be able to do that.

  • mommykink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Organic intelligence? The qualifier never kind of removes a lot of answers when you also say “never”

    • bouh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      A bit fallacious to add “organic” to intelligence. But then I’m sure we will be able to make organic computers at some point. I think there is research into this already.

    • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t know, there are a couple pretty good ones here by chatgpt:

      Of course! Here are some classic dad jokes for you:

      1. Why don’t skeletons fight each other? They don’t have the guts.
      1. Did you hear about the cheese factory that exploded? There was nothing left but de-brie.
      2. I used to play piano by ear, but now I use my hands.
      3. What do you call a fish with no eyes? Fsh.
      4. Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field.
      5. What’s brown and sticky? A stick.
      6. How does a penguin build its house? Igloos it together.
      7. I’m reading a book on anti-gravity. It’s impossible to put down.
      8. Parallel lines have so much in common. It’s a shame they’ll never meet.
      9. Did you hear about the mathematician who’s afraid of negative numbers? He’ll stop at nothing to avoid them.