I don’t mean doctor-making-150k-a-year rich, I mean properly rich with millions to billions of dollars.

I think many will say yes, they can be, though it may be rare. I was tempted to. I thought more about it and I wondered, are you really a good person if you’re hoarding enough money you and your family couldn’t spend in 10 lifetimes?

I thought, if you’re a good person, you wouldn’t be rich. And if you’re properly rich you’re probably not a good person.

I don’t know if it’s fair or naive to say, but that’s what I thought. Whether it’s what I believe requires more thought.

There are a handful of ex-millionaires who are no longer millionaires because they cared for others in a way they couldn’t care for themselves. Only a handful of course, I would say they are good people.

And in order to stay rich, you have to play your role and participate in a society that oppresses the poor which in turn maintains your wealth. Are you really still capable of being a good person?

Very curious about people’s thoughts on this.

  • HandsHurtLoL@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t think I can 100% get behind the direct link that being an artist makes you a virtuous person, though I understand your bigger point.

    I think we are overlooking tremendously how the art world is often a method in which the ultra wealthy wash their money. I don’t think that artists that rise to the level of success of becoming a household name are blind to this.

    • PugJesus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I meant more that art isn’t an inherently morally problematic way of making a large amount of money, unlike, say, crushing surplus value out of the working class at the expense of their health and happiness.

      • HandsHurtLoL@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah I get your larger point, but if an artist makes bank off someone who is crushing surplus value out of the working class, then isn’t that still evil but with extra steps?

        • PugJesus@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean, we’re getting to ‘there is no ethical consumption under capitalism’ level abstraction there, and it’s a bit early in the morning for me to be arguing for or against that. XD