Actor Michael Imperioli has something to say about the Supreme Court’s Friday ruling in favor of a Christian web designer who refuses to create websites to celebrate same-sex weddings.

  • Nougat@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    It is not a protected class at the federal level. It is in many states.

    However, part of the argument in favor of making same sex marriage a right, as ordered in Obergefell, so that no state can refuse to marry same sex couples, is that the only difference between an opposite sex couple and a same sex couple is the sex of one of the people. Hence, the discrimination is on the basis of sex, which is a protected class federally.

    Why that same argument wouldn’t apply to the more recent web designer case is beyond me.

    • Bluskale@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why that same argument wouldn’t apply to the more recent web designer case is beyond me.

      Ahh, about that, well… welcome to the new Robert’s Court, where the facts are made up and the precedent doesn’t matter.

      From courtroom to Congress, it seems these days conservatives only look at getting things their way, with consequences & the nation at large be damned. At times there’s startlingly little ideological consistency being proffered to justify their actions, and sometimes they even punish other conservatives to force getting their way (see recent rejection of a multitude of bills in Texas because the governor didn’t get his favored legislation through, for instance). I don’t see how this can be kept up long term… it’s like venture capitalism has infected the government and we’re working on burning out all the assets still.