At the moment the internet is flawed, do you think the fediverse is the solution?

  • tookmyname@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    No. And that’s fine. I don’t expect underground music to replace top 40. And there’s a place for both.

  • sunaurus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Probably not replace, but certainly it could be a viable and thriving part of the picture. I don’t think there’s anything wrong with having options.

  • Knighthawk 0811@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    since there isn’t any strong way to collect data or advertise it will always be an underdog compared to big business.

    that being said, the fediverse could outlast a few mainstream networks and build lasting strength with that. I’m an ideal setting it could become a defacto network over time.

    can we get young people coming here though? that’s how we get the tides to turn

  • ilikenoodlez@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    No it turns the problem from your account being owned by a company looking to turn a profit to random people on the internet. If we had a way of downloading our accounts and transferring instances then maybe.

  • noahm@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    No. Fediverse is great by design, but is too complicated at the moment (maybe it’s just how platforms are set up at the moment).

    The design is not too intuitive in looking at other posts from different instances/servers.

    For example going to this post:

    • clovis@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It seems you are confusing Lemmy (which is one of the federated software powering the fediverse) with the fediverse as a whole. There is a lot of other soft running, like mastodon for most well known or peertube, providing other services, with others UIs :)

  • Cambionn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Would be cool and technically possible, but I doubt it will happen.

    Big Tech throwing millions into marketing and vendor lock-ins vs OpenSource projects that are decentralised and often running on donations and goodwill. That’s a very touch battle to win, especially when most people care more about ease of use and amount of possible followers than about privacy and decentralisation.

    Mastodon grew, but only took a tiny slice of Twitter and half of Mastodon are bots or people who crosspost to both. I expect the same to happen to Lemmy/Reddit, and any other SNS that goes this direction.

    I’m content with a stable and active niche group of SNSs. Hopefully the open source and decentralisation aspects can prevent it from dying and going to the next SNS as the big ones tend to do. Which cóúld be as people can make newer applications that work with the old ones as long as it all runs on ActivityPup. I feel it’s the most realistic way of thinking.

    But maybe I’m just too pessimistic. Even the biggest people in tech stuggle to predict the future of it. So who knows.

    • rysiek@szmer.info
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Mastodon grew, but only took a tiny slice of Twitter

      Growth is not the only, nor even main, metric to measure success of fedi. Fedi is not a VC-funded startup that needs to grow exponentially to remain viable (consider how that worked for Twitter and Reddit…).

      Building a resilient, safe, longterm-viable communities is the metric to measure fedi by. That takes more time, than hooking people on endorphin/noradrenalin high and slick interfaces.

      half of Mastodon are bots or people who crosspost to both.

      This is false. I follow a couple of thousand people and have an interesting, diverse, funny, and informative timeline. Very few accounts I follow crosspost.

      There is no recommendation algorithm so your timeline is what you make of it. It takes a bit more time to curate, but you end up with your own thing that suits you — if you put in the tiny bit of effort required.

      • Cambionn@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I am very well aware about the lack of algoritm and how Mastodon works. But the issue is not for me, I like Mastodon! And I don’t like Twitter at all. But it is for Average Joe, who needs to come over in order to replace the place of Big Tech SNSs.

        Growth is not the only, nor even main, metric to measure success of fedi.

        If the Fediverse just wants to exist stabely, even be mentionable in size, it is not. But to take over from the Big Tech SNSs, it is. People are where other people are. And that’s what the topic was about, replacing Big Tech SNSs.

        This is false. I follow a couple of thousand people and have an interesting, diverse, funny, and informative timeline. Very few accounts I follow crosspost Don’t get me wrong, I enjoy Mastodon. I also talk with some i teresting people there. But I still cannot follow any of the local news there without bots that copy Twitter. I also know companies who have accounts on both, and beside of reactions on what people say, their updates are cross-posted (manually). Not everything, but if you want to follow companies and people outside of tech-related scenes yoh already need to be happy if they have a cross-posting Mastodon.

        For me, it’s enough. But for Average Joe, who wants to commend on their favourite influencers and use it to talk to custoner support of delivery coyriers and stores they buy from, it is not. In fact, customer support is the only reason I have a Twitter account.

        That takes more time, than hooking people on endorphin/noradrenalin high and slick interfaces. Sadly, Average Joe just want his endorphin kick 🥲.