• Glunkbor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Good bid, if Chelsea doesn’t give up on their nonsense 80m, then we should just move on. We have enough drama and sagas going on, we don’t need more.

    • evildiscoguy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      My only worry is that United’s Art of the Deal takes over and we end up paying even more because we’ve dragged our heels too long. Set a limit and walk away if they refuse.

    • detinu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The fact that they most likely can get 50 should be enough for them as they have so many players they need to sell.

  • brcl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    While I’m not personally a fan of Mount, he would give depth which is sorely needed. It’s also nice to see us trying to do business early, just hope we don’t drag it on.

    • LUHG@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’d add depth but 50m would make him 1st team and somebody else is going to be the depth option. Would he get in City’s team or even Arsenal?

  • letThemPlay@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Let’s see if we’ve learnt our transfer lessons this time. Hopefully get this done quickly, and have all business done before preseason.

  • Reddevilegg@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hopefully we move on if they reject the next bid and start looking at someone else. I’d love for us to get him but surely there’s someone similar out there who who’ll be better or won’t cost 70/80