Hello guys, I’m have little to no experience when i have to deal with networking or cybersecurity.

I recently created a backend RESTful API on my Ubuntu VM on my personal desktop and dockerized the app, connecting it to a bridge network named ‘tunnel.’ I also have the Cloudflare Docker hosted in the same ‘tunnel’ network, which allows my local RESTful API Docker to be accessible via my domain and exposed to the internet.

Can anyone help me understand if this setup poses any security risks to my home network?

If so, what should I do to help reduce the risk? I have read that firewall helps, but does a restful api container developed with golang requires it?

  • adamshand@alien.topBEnglish
    1·
    1 year ago

    There’s nothing inherently insecure about exposing a service to the internet. But it does create an attack surface.

    A firewall or proxy (Cloudflare, Nginx etc) allows you to restrict access via ip address or authentication, but if there’s a bug in your service it can still be exploited.

    The good news about a service you write is that there are no ready built tools to exploit it. The bad news is that there are almost certainly more bugs.

    So it really comes down to what your ap has access to (is it jailed or restricted in someway), is it read only or does it allow modifying file in the system? How confident are you with your code? If someone starts bashing in it, will you be alerted? Is it did get a coloured how serious would that be? There is no “right” answer, is a risk assessment you have to make based on your situation.

    • Sheeesssshhhhhh@alien.topOPBEnglish
      1·
      1 year ago

      My APIs require just a simple api key to be placed in a json header to make a request.

      It is just some personal android apps connected to these APIs to interact with certain databases. While there’s no sensitive data involved, I am more concerned about specifically, if there’s a possibility that an attacker could use this to gain access to my personal computer or other devices connected to my home network.

      Should I create a sub network and get a raspberry pi to host these apps?

      • Simon-RedditAccount@alien.topBEnglish
        1·
        1 year ago

        A DMZ is always recommended in such cases.

        > Should I create a sub network and get a raspberry pi to host these apps?

        Yes, it’s always better. However, Pi may be overpriced now. Take a look at NUC-sized miniPCs, for roughly the same price you’ll get much more computing power.

          • weeklygamingrecap@alien.topBEnglish
            1·
            1 year ago

            This new wave of “buy a core i7 4th gen USFF PC instead of a Pi” is wild. It’s really case by case of what you are doing but lots of people seem to push “proxmox and tons of VMs! or GTFO” on everyone.

        • Sheeesssshhhhhh@alien.topOPBEnglish
          1·
          1 year ago

          But ya, i mentioned in the other comment that I placed an order this morning.

          After a light research on the comparison, I guess I will cancel the order for it. Is there any particular model that you recommend for several dockerized golang apps?

    • TheGr8CodeWarrior@alien.topBEnglish
      1·
      1 year ago

      > There’s nothing inherently insecure about exposing a service to the internet. But it does create an attack surface.
      Way too many people I know work in security don’t understand this. I’ve tried explaining to people that exposing a hardened SSH endpoint is almost the same thing as exposing a VPN endpoint.
      Most people think that anything public facing with authentication is by design bad. (The VPN endpoint still handles authentication btw) but fail to acknowledge the thousands and thousands of secure systems running in that fashion today that they use on a daily basis (social media, web host control panels, etc.)

      Making a service publicfacing is not by itself insecure. Generally if you can avoid doing it, you should, but hardening an endpoint to make the risk satisfactory is your goal when you need to.

      Public SSH is not a bad thing. Password auth, root login allowed, and no ip ban mechanism (fail2ban) is a bad security configuration.

      TL;DR

      Public endpoints should be hardened to what you think is an acceptable risk.
      With your API, your should fuzz it and consider the attack surface inside your API.
      What inputs are you accepting? Are they sanitized? Can you lock down the endpoint with authentication?