All the news headlines and verdict said sexual abuse, which was kind of vague, but I just found out today that the judge clarified that this was a matter of legal definition and by the verdict of the trial and the case, trump has been found guilty of penetrative rape.

  • Afghaniscran
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I haven’t been following this tbh since I’m not American but I did read another comment that said something about the statute of limitations so maybe criminal charges can’t be brought due to that weird part of the law where rape gets an expiry date.

    • Kepabar@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Correct, the state passed a law allowing those cases where statue of limitations have been passed for criminal trails to still sue their attacker in civil court.

      It’s been suggested this was passed specifically to target Trump, but a good number of sexual assaults never go reported and I believe a few hundred cases have come from this law.

      It has since expired, it was only valid for one year.

    • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      He would never have been charged criminally because of the lack of evidence. It’s quite honestly absurd that he lost this case based on the lack of evidence. I mean she literally can’t even name a year that this life changing event supposedly happened.

      I’m sure Donald Trump is a sex pest, his “grab em by the pussy” speech and various other comments all but assure that, but this case was absurd.