Jorgelino@lemmy.ml to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 年前Very clever...lemmy.mlimagemessage-square293fedilinkarrow-up12.35Karrow-down119file-text
arrow-up12.33Karrow-down1imageVery clever...lemmy.mlJorgelino@lemmy.ml to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 年前message-square293fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarexmunk@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 年前Yea, vim really isn’t anything near how useful emacs is.
minus-square_dev_null@lemmy.zxcvn.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down1·1 年前Emacs really is powerful, all it needs now is a decent text editor.
minus-squarenautilus@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 年前emacs is solely for watching the text version of Star Wars and you know it
minus-squareKogasa@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 年前Not at all what I meant. It’s just, out of the box, a powerful text editor that can be configured and built on if desired. If you want it to be more than a text editor, you can easily make it so.
minus-squarenickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-21 年前Eh. Both are good choices. I prefer vim for my workflows - I like the terminal. ETA: Will have to give Emacs another go though at some point.
Yea, vim really isn’t anything near how useful emacs is.
Emacs really is powerful, all it needs now is a decent text editor.
It has one. It’s called evil-mode.
emacs is solely for watching the text version of Star Wars and you know it
Not at all what I meant. It’s just, out of the box, a powerful text editor that can be configured and built on if desired. If you want it to be more than a text editor, you can easily make it so.
Eh. Both are good choices. I prefer vim for my workflows - I like the terminal.
ETA: Will have to give Emacs another go though at some point.