Multiple southern states and a few midwestern states are at “extreme threat” levels of “wet bulb temperature”.

  • Puppy@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    1 year ago

    If we were in the right timeline we would have fixed our dependance to fossil energy a long ass time ago.

    Instead we’ve got a bunch of people who still believe vaccines causes autism because the internet told them that.

    When did we fail going forward? As humanity, I mean.

    • Ganondorf@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s really so sad and frustrating for those under the age of 45. Millennials were raised during a time of prosperity and possibilities, only to find out it was all a sham by the selfish, stupid and mostly older generations. Now Millennials, Gen Z and Gen A will reap the outcomes of all that while those who caused it will die off before things get even worse. I harbor no resent towards Gen X, but their refusal to fight the tide certainly didn’t help.

      • thesebits@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        1 year ago

        as a genXer we were promised and viewed all that could be done and was being done. then they voted in Reagan and was all stripped away. any glimpse of prosperity during the 90s was GenX optimism that was destroyed in 2000 when it was all stolen from everyone again. GenX doesn’t do anything anymore because we were told to shut up as we grew up in the 80s and then had it stolen again in the 2000 election.

      • Turkey_Titty_city@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        Do you hang out with people under 45?

        People are selfish and stupid no matter the age. My city is full of people driving gas guzzlers, traveling all the time, and ordering UberEats for every meal. They are all under 45. Then gen Z are particular bad and refuse to use public transit.

        It’s not about age. It’s about class/wealthy. The poor use far fewer resources than the wealthy do. Rich young people are living in 5000sq ft homes by themselves and burning through natural gas and oil. They aren’t living in 500sq ft apartment like ordinary folks.

        • Pagpag@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Your comment makes me feel self conscious as a mid 30s bachelor lol. After I got divorced…and kept the house I bought for us and our future family, I now live alone in a 3500sqft house.

          It’s a god damn burden more than anything. There’s so much wasted space, and everything is more. More expensive to maintain, more expensive to heat and cool, and so much more to clean. Otherwise, I live a pretty modest life; cook, clean, and maintain everything solo.

          I really just like my location and workshop. I’d be more than happy to have 800sqft living… the thing is that this house was cheap relatively speaking ($245k in 2017).

          At this point, it would cost substantially more for me to downsize and move… I kinda feel trapped but more in an analysis paralysis way. So many variables and too many decisions.

          • digitalgadget@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            My mom is in a similar situation. We all grew up and moved out of the 5 bedroom house, then Dad died and now she lives in it alone. She doesn’t want all the space, but selling and buying a small home would actually not net her any profit and it’s a huge hassle.

        • setInner234@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Agree with everything you’re saying, but one slight problem with public transit is just how ridiculously unsafe it feels. People might be much more likely to get injured in a car crash, but the fear of being attacked or otherwise molested on public transport is simply bigger.

          • vaeleery@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s not even the real issue imo, just the symptom. Public transit needs to be an actually viable alternative to driving which is hard to do when it’s underfunded and we bulldozed our cities to build low-density car-dependent hellscapes we now call cities. If I get out of the states at some point I want to go somewhere walkable with nice transit so badly. Not Just Bikes has me wanting to go to Amsterdam, that looks heavenly

          • albinanigans@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Unsafe and unreliable (YMMV, of course).

            In my neck of the woods,if I have to choose between getting stuck in traffic for 10 minutes or wait for a bus to be late (if it shows) for a 2 hour roundtrip, I’ll just get in my car.

      • DarkGamer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I harbor no resent towards Gen X, but their refusal to fight the tide certainly didn’t help.

        @Ganondorf While growing up, GenX was vastly outnumbered by Greatest Generation, Silent Generation & Boomers. The stereotype is that they cynically opted out but I think a lot of that was because there were limited democratic options available and it was deeply frustrating to many.

        It’s really so sad and frustrating for those under the age of 45. Millennials were raised during a time of prosperity and possibilities, only to find out it was all a sham by the selfish, stupid and mostly older generations.

        I share your frustration. The US is still the wealthiest country on earth by a large margin, with many possibilities if we can convince ourselves to share it equitably. We could make our systemic incentives virtuous rather than destructive. We don’t need to squeeze everyone and reward bad actors to have abundance.

      • Redhotkurt@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I harbor no resent towards Gen X, but their refusal to fight the tide certainly didn’t help.

        Not all of us were apathetic; there were many who tried to fight for what was considered really progressive ideas at the time, like fighting for equal rights and against climate change, but there weren’t enough of us. We’re a smaller generation anyway, didn’t have a good way to make our voices heard since the internet was still in its infancy, and were turned into a punchline by the media. And everybody believed it. Slacker, freeloader, tree-hugger, JFC it’s no wonder why nobody took us seriously. I mean, frick, in the 90s everyone got their news from four network channels and a few cable channels on tv, so America believed the hype and largely wrote us off.

        We tried, man. We did the absolute best we could with a shitty situation, and it stings to think about how we weren’t able to accomplish more in our youth. Please don’t write us off as a useless apathetic generation, we’ve already been through that before. Besides, you’re probably thinking of our parents, the Boomer generation (born 1945-1965). They aren’t entirely to blame for the country’s problems, but they held (still do in many ways) most of the power and chose to throw their support behind rich wealthy conservative assholes, and we’re still feeling the affects of their decisions. Again, they don’t deserve all the blame, but the sheer amount of Boomer shit contributions to society dwarfs what the worst of Gen X ever did.

      • plain_jane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I feel like you’re doing Gen X a huge disservice here. Like there’s a chunk of history you’re not familiar with.

        Gen X was the first generation to go to college only to come out saddled with debt and only “mcjobs” to show for it. We graduated into NAFTA and globalisation.

        There were some hardcore protests, movements, and mobilisations around the issues that matter… Economy, environment, women’s rights, employee rights, animal welfare rights, etc.

        It has very obviously continued to deteriorate, but I’ll admit there was optimism because we did see some gains and some promise… I can’t remember the last time I felt any optimism about this world.

        I feel horrible for the younger generations.

      • Suddenmoose@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Millennials were raised during a time of prosperity and possibilities

        ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha h ah aha h ah ah ah

        zoom zoom talkin out his ass like the 2000s were the golden gen

        • nymwit@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Still a millennial if you were born in early 80s. I’d say the 90s were a pretty golden time for a lot of the US.

          • keeb420@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            yeah i was a kid in the 90s it was a great time to be a kid. everything after 2000 though weve been hosed repeatedly and told to enjoy it.

          • digitalgadget@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah when I was like ten. By the time my generation was old enough to get jobs and start families, it all went to shit.

        • prole@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          You should look up but definition of millennial. I am one, and I was very much alive during the 90s and early 00s (prior to 9/11 at least).

    • prole@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      When did we fail going forward? As humanity, I mean.

      The moment we invented religion and became OK with believing extreme claims with zero evidence.

    • thbb@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Just don’t believe this is anything new. Back in time, people used to seriously believe in faeries, trolls, deamons, angels and other supernatural phenomena.

      That’s how you could lead people to carry holy wars and consider serfdom and slavery as natural order of things.

      Back in the 80’s, I remember a report from an ethnologist going to Nepal and meeting people who seriously believed that Russians had goat feet.

      If anything, the internet has revealed the credulity of the general population, and provides means to fight and contain superstitions of various kinds.

      I’m an optimist.

    • FaceDeer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      When did we fail going forward? As humanity, I mean.

      There have always been people who opposed progress for various reasons, and sometimes their reasons were understandable and even forgivable. Nobody can care about everything at once in equal measure and sometimes the safest default is “let’s not rock the boat when things seem to be going well.”

      There’s one current obstacle to progress that I have a harder time forgiving, though. Every time there’s discussion of the possibility of doing some research into geoengineering as a means to counteract climate change a whole pile of people come out with “but that will only encourage more burning of fossil fuels” and “haven’t you seen Snowpiercer?” counterarguments. It’s wearying. The same people usually love the “we’ve passed an irreversible tipping point” articles that go on about how doomed we all are and how futile any further attempts to reverse climate change are.

      If they really think we’re doomed and nothing more can be done, then get out of the way of the people who are still trying to come up with solutions. A generation ago the same problem prevented nuclear power from being a useful solution.

      • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        What’s sad is nuclear power is still a useful solution. It’s not a perfect solution. Not by a long shot. But as far as non-renewable power sources go, nuclear is by far the most efficient. Yet today the US has virtually no nuclear power development going on.

        • FaceDeer@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well, I sort of push nuclear power back from the “useful solution” slot at this point in history because now the problem is no longer preventing global temperatures from rising - that’s a done deal now. Drastically cutting our carbon dioxide emissions are still a good idea but no longer all that’s necessary any more. Plus solar and wind power are really coming into their own, so nuclear’s good but no longer the only game in town on that front either.

          I fear that eventually geoengineering will have been put off for so long that we’ll be in a situation where “yeah, reducing global temperatures would be nice, but vast regions of farmland already turned to desert so the real problem we’re facing these days is how to rapidly spin up new farmland and that old problem of lowering global temperatures is no longer all that’s necessary any more. Maybe if we’d seriously investigated doing it back in the 2020s it would have made a difference then.”