Okay, so today I am at the zoo getting drunk and ogling animals, and after a long chat with one of the zookeepers, I am now forced to ask this question.

Like, climate collapse is a real thing that will render most species extinct, and most conservation efforts are focused on, well, conserving what we have. But I don’t know of any effort to preserve samples of animal DNA, be it blood, gametes or whatever, so that if a species does go extinct, it could in the future, in principle, be revived.

So are there any zookeepers, biologists or other knowledgeable people in the house who could explain this? It seems like a serious overlooked gap in species preservation that needs to be closed sooner rather than later.

    • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Huh. I did a Startpage search and that never popped up. Okay, that was a little silly 😅

      Thanks. I am glad I am not the only one on the planet who has thought of such a thing

  • Num10ck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    because just having the DNA isn’t enough, you need a viable suitable fertilized cell of that animal, and then would need a compatible womb able to accept and nurture it until viable. then that creature would need to be raised in a manner that allows it to live to maturity and then partnered with a suitor. it of course needs the right food and area. so like it needs a zoo, and vets, and animal husbandry experts. and its got to be cute or interesting enough to be worth paying to visit.

      • Num10ck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        yea its worth a shot, better than nothing, but still not successful yet, ever. theres a pretty good book about trying this in detail you might enjoy: Jurassic Park.