• unfreeradical@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Skills differ qualitatively, but not by expressing any natural ranking as greater or lesser one against another.

    • Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Well, I do agree that the surgeon isn’t necessarily a better person because he has spend more time studying, but the greater time investment in training a surgeon is something that needs to be taken into consideration. How do you think should it be considered?

      • unfreeradical@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Now you are shifting the goalposts. I am not asserting that no one would take note of how someone may acquire one skill compared to another.

        Again, skills are different, not greater or lesser.

        • Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Again, skills are different, not greater or lesser.

          That’s what’s called an axiom, because it’s a statement that can’t really be argued. To disprove it, a valuation of skills would need to be imposed, and any valuation could just as easily be rejected, or turn out to be useless. And I do agree with your axiom.

          So, my question is, what conclusions do you derive from the axiom?