• nitrolife@rekabu.ru
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I really don’t understand the topic well, but I searched the Internet and indeed wind generation is possible. but there is still no solar generation due to too short daylight hours. as for hydroelectric power plants, they are already around. I did not think that they are considered green, given that they require flooding of huge territories.

    UPD: also, for any large wind generation, forests will most likely have to be cut down.

    • dcat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      whaaat?! we have to flood areas for hydroelectric? and cut down forests for wind generation?! oh well, then that’s it, it’s settled.

      guess we should just go back to burning coal then.

      • nitrolife@rekabu.ru
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why you? I was talking about my geographical area. And we don’t build any wind turbines, we just use nuclear and hydroelectric power plants. although, of course, we mainly use thermal power plants.

        Climate is a planetary-scale problem, so it is impossible to build environmentally friendly energy production on one side of the earth in the hope of overcoming warming. Maybe my English is not good enough. This is my third language, so I’m really sorry.