OpenAI was working on advanced model so powerful it alarmed staff::Reports say new model Q* fuelled safety fears, with workers airing their concerns to the board before CEO Sam Altman’s sacking

  • db2@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    That’s exactly what it is. A ploy for free attention and it’s working.

      • db2@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        ploy
        /ploi/
        noun
        a cunning plan or action designed to turn a situation to one’s own advantage.

        Except for the cunning part it seems to be a pretty good description.

        • pulaskiwasright@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          There’s no way the board members tarnished their reputations and lost their jobs so they could get attention for a company they no longer work for and don’t have a stake in. That’s just silly.

          • assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t think the firing was a ploy, but I do think the retroactive justification of ‘we were building a model so powerful it scared us’ is a ploy to drum up hype. Just like all the other times they’ve said the same thing.

    • Identity3000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That’s an appealing ‘conspiracy’ angle, and I understand why it might seem juicy and tantalising to onlookers, but that idea doesn’t hold up to any real scrutiny whatsoever.

      Why would the Board willingly trash their reputation? Why would they drag the former Twitch CEO through the mud and make him look weak and powerless? Why would they not warn Microsoft and risk damaging that relationship? Why would they let MS strike a tentative agreement with the OpenAI employees that upsets their own staff, only to then undo it?

      None of that makes any sense whatsoever from a strategic, corporate “planned” perspective. They are all actions of people who are reacting to things in the heat of the moment and are panicking because they don’t know how it will end.

      • db2@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why would the Board willingly trash their reputation?

        What reputation?

        Why would they drag the former Twitch CEO through the mud and make him look weak and powerless?

        Why would they care about that?

        Why would they not warn Microsoft and risk damaging that relationship? Why would they let MS strike a tentative agreement with the OpenAI employees that upsets their own staff, only to then undo it?

        Microsoft has put their entire sack in OpenAI’s purse. They could literally do or say anything to Microsoft.

        Are you telling me you really think it’s outlandish to think the same people who push a glorified nested ‘if’ statement as AI would do what it said to do? Those people are goofy, if they thought they were being given a convoluted real life quest by a digital DM they’d be all about it.

    • Echo Dot
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why would they want attention not a publicly traded company?

      • db2@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What’s that got to do with anything? They sell a thing, they want the thing to sell more.

        • Echo Dot
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think pretty much the entire world knows about chat GPT so clearly advertising isn’t an issue for them. Firing your CEO is not really a good look unless you’ve got a very very good reason in which case you should announce it.

          • db2@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Which they didn’t because it’s fake grandstanding bullshit.