Ukrainian forces have gained control of the Dnipro left bank’s floodplain in Kherson Oblast, forcing the Russians to build new defensive lines on hills farther from the river, former Aidar Battalion company commander Yevhen Dykyi told Radio NV.

“In fact, the Dnipro floodplain is effectively under Ukrainian control. And now the Russians are trying to prevent any further steps. They have essentially ceded the floodplain to us, but they are trying to dig in and fortify themselves where the terrain begins to rise. Although it’s not accurate to call them hills, there is a slight elevation compared to the mostly flat terrain. At the moment, they are trying to dig in, fortify themselves, and establish some sort of defensive line along this elevation,” Dykyi said, noting that the Russians have nothing similar to the so-called Surovikin defensive line

    • Infiltrated_ad8271@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      61
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also with some losses, no significant progress on either side and everything going at an extremely slow pace; basically a stalemate… for now.

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        61
        ·
        1 year ago

        A newly established bridgehead on the “left” (Eastern) bank of the Dnipro certainly counts as significant progress.

        • Infiltrated_ad8271@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          26
          ·
          1 year ago

          It may become so, but it is not yet.
          I wonder if there are precedents for creating one slowly for weeks, with the passivity of the enemy.

          • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            26
            ·
            1 year ago

            It may become so, but it is not yet.

            I think we’re holding different definitions of “significant progress”. Can you give an example of your definition? Do you only consider “significant progress” a full rout of Moscovite forces?

            • Infiltrated_ad8271@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              19
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I don’t think you don’t appreciate what has happened so far. Occupying a terrain that is almost impassable, unusable, of no strategic or tactical value, etc, is not significant progress. When they overcome that terrain and establish a real bridgehead, capable of fortifying, expanding, providing logistical support, etc, it will be significant progress.

              • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Occupying a terrain that is almost impassable, unusable, of no strategic or tactical value, etc, is not significant progress.

                I might agree with that logic, but the land on the left bank where the bridgehead is maybe only one of those things.