• McLeavey@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    “… the camera was originally planned to sell for about US$1,000 (with a lower-priced $400 to $700 version to follow), it will now set you back $5,495…”

    You could also buy a fully functional Beaulieu cine16 camera with lenses for less than $2k and still have $3k to spend on the purchase and development of the film.

    This is only going to sell to influencers or people who have more money to waste than film making talent. Kodak, whom invented the video camera then shelved it, is a great example of how to run a multi billion dollar company into the ground with pure hubris.

    • Javasndphotoclicks@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re thinking of the digital camera that was developed in 1975 they shelved because they were seeing a roll of film that cost them 5 cents to make for $2.

    • WaitingForNormal@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yeah, I wonder how loud this thing is though. Is that used beaulieu motor still gonna be sync? Also looks like this thing has a video tap, that’s nice. What people really need to consider are the prices not shown here. The film, the processing, the video transfer…

    • Wooow675@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      After taxes that’s a $6k Super 8 camera.

      I’m just reading my sentence out loud and I can’t believe this is a real thing.

    • RobertdBanks@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Holllly fuck, I remember $1k seeming steep, $5k ensures literally no one will buy this. Wow, how disappointing. I’ve literally been looking forward to this thing since like 2016.

      • Dull-Lead-7782@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They were able to restructure in bankruptcy, sell off some assets and bounce back. A big money maker for them is an archival film stock for long term storage of theatrical releases

      • Lujho@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        As in, the brand name’s been bought and sold a few times and there’s really no relation to the original company? You do see that a lot with old hi-fi brands and such, but I think Kodak is still THE Kodak.

      • JacobVossFilm@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Kodak is not a zombie company. Still produce motion picture film that we use every day (also pharmaceuticals now lol)

    • Mallingong@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      All that and it charges via Micro USB, there are cameras designed for children that have more advanced features than this garbage.