Probably the best example I can think of is Diane Duane reworking her Wizards series to make it modern-day, but there are others, including owners of a literary estate altering books left to them to make them compatible with current standards.

What do you think? Does it matter if it’s the original author or an inheritor?

  • fullybookedtx@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Generally, I’m for it! But I agree it should be explicitly labeled as a revised version. I would especially love updated versions edited to remove outdated language/stereotypes/slurs. For example, you’d be hard-pressed to find a non-revised Nancy Drew book. I don’t really care if it’s the author or a ghostwriter doing it, a long as it’s labeled. As for updating it strictly to keep up with the times, like changing a rotary phone to a mobile, I’m not really interested in that, but it’s also not… harmful. Like, I don’t care that much.