Have you ever played a game that was absolutely phenomenal, but when you reached the ending, an extremely disappointing scene played out?

Dark Souls 1 definitely did that for me. Really not a big fan of both endings.

  • _fatherfucker69@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    The main problem with Hogwarts is that it tried too hard to be so big. I don’t want a 50 hour adventure, I want to explore Hogwarts and have fun for 10-20 hours before I eventually get bored of it and do something else

    They should have only done Hogwarts, forbidden forest and hogshead imo . Everything beyond that is filler .

    • choma90@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      If I can’t squish 100 hours out of a 60usd game, it better be best fucking game ever made, otherwise not worth it.

      • cyrilamethyst@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Is this sarcasm, or a legitimate opinion of yours?

        Games end up with mega empty worlds and repetitive, grindy content because of some misguided “dollar per hour” reasoning like this.

        I encourage all to rethink the importance of quality in their gaming experiences. You can only play so many games in your life. Make sure you aren’t squeezing the last unenjoyable drop from something just because it’s there.

        • choma90@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          If I get bored exploring an empty world I’m not getting 100 hours either. Many games have both size and quality.

          I live in a third world country making 300 usd a month. If a 60 usd game bores me in less than a month it’s money wasted