I’ve been an ostrich for the past… however long. There was a moment there where the cracks in the corporate internet looked like everything was about to come tumbling down, and with it the Death of Capitalism! and we’d all just be sassy anarchist trash animals dancing in the flames… But we’re in a slow crumble, not a cathartic collapse. I felt keyed up and ready to fuck shit up, but I didn’t know what to throw rocks at, and so I didn’t, and in the meantime I still got bills and people I care about so I guess I’ll just keep going to work until something changes. Things do change… But never in the “right” way. So now I’m in a rut that feels like it has all of us, where I’m constantly tired, barely making ends meet, and unable to do anything with my life aside from work and maintain myself so I can still work.
I wasn’t supposed to come back online for the first time in months to run off on my usual, literally tired rant. I was supposed to come on to tell you to read “The Mysteries” if you haven’t already.
I only just picked up my copy two days ago. I had seen the video about how Bill Watterson and John Kascht had spent years figuring out not just how to make this book, but how to even rectify their apparently incompatible styles and methods. The story of two folks who one assumes must be friends (and if not friends, clearly had a lot of respect and admiration for each other) who spent years banging their heads against a wall together and somehow managed to not bang heads too hard against each other is remarkable. The story of this book could almost overshadow the book itself…
Except the book is very, very good. Given what I had heard going in, “An adult fable, a picture book, with an aggressively stylized aesthetic,” I was worried I would enjoy it, find it charming and something nice to look at, but somehow inescapably trite. Instead I found my anxieties mirrored and acknowledged, and told to remember we are all dust. Not an original meditation, but a gorgeous attempt at rendering it.
I’m not going too in-depth on the “narrative” here, or what I think one should take from it. It’s just an incredibly brief parable of human social evolution (I’d say “social progress” but whether or not that is debatable is, at least from the narrative’s timeline, irrelevant). This is mostly a visual piece.
The book feels like a collection of… almost colloidion photography, with it’s concrete starkness that sublimates into a dark etherealness. Everything has the feel of long shutter speeds and slow emulsions, a moment caught in molasses instead of film. The stark shift from John’s eye for detail and Bill’s efficient abstraction likely punches this effect up considerably. I’m not someone who knows much about art, but I’ve always fallen for it more when it heavily intersects with craft. And these images were absolutely crafted. If I’m ever in a situation where I could have wall art, I would deeply like prints of a few of the pages from this book… but given Bill’s history with merchandising, I don’t see that happening in any official capacity. I’m also loathe to the idea of any one of these pages out of it’s context.
(Continued in the comments)
I really enjoyed the video that was released by the publisher about Watterson’s and Kascht’s collaboration on the illustrations. I found the actual book to be underwhelming but I’m very glad that they made it just so that I could have that brief glimpse into Watterson’s artistic process. Here is a link to the video for anyone interested
It’s a shame that so many subs of r/books apparently resent reading; but I loved this book too, and I really appreciate your post.
Where was it sent the first time?
You have my interest!
Is this Calvin and Hobbes Bill Watterson?
Aye.
Yes.
I flipped through this at a bookstore because it takes 2 minutes to finish. It’s completely forgettable. Watterson must have really needed some cash.
Hot take straight out of the dumpster. Maybe stick to the adult coloring section
It is not a good read.
Regardless of your thoughts on the book, calling Watterson a sellout is one of the dumber things I’ve ever seen on Reddit.
Why? It’s a bad read and terribly overpriced. Doing it this way doesn’t tarnish his C&H legacy. It’s a smart move. If his name isn’t on this, nobody would give this a second glance.
Because if he wanted to just make a quick buck, there are a thousand ways he could do it that would be easier and more lucrative.
A new deluxe edition of C&H strips. Selling original art. Writing an autobiography. Doing a more traditional comic book. Even simply continuing C&H straight up. None of those would have tarnished his legacy at all.
You’re certainly right that the book wouldn’t have gotten the attention it did without his name, but that doesn’t mean it was a cash grab. He has had ample opportunity over the last 3 decades to do something for quick money. There’s zero reason to believe that’s the motivation for a niche book like this.
If he was a sellout, Bill Watterson could have made a lot of money putting Calvin and Hobbes on merchandise. He still could if he wanted to.
OP I’m sorry so many people are complaining about your post. I enjoyed it and it made me curious about the book!
Wait damn it’s that Bill Watterson? Gotta check this out
I pre-ordered it for my husband as he’s a huge Calvin and Hobbes fan.
It was $20.
It was like 5 pages.
It was a massive ripoff and a mediocre story trying to be deep.
The art isn’t even very good.
I’m so glad to see some love for this book because I felt that way but everything I’ve read online so far just trashes it. Yeah, okay, it’s not a long book, it’s not a meaty book in word count terms, but it makes its point well, and beautifully. I think there is a place for, basically, grown up picture books. I mean, graphic novels are often more graphic than novel and yet many people get a lot out of them.
To me, as someone who is often sick with the thought of how we are destroying everything wonderful on this planet, it’s a very hopeful message that regardless of what we do, if/when we self-destruct, some beauty and magic in the universe will survive and go on just fine without us.
The death of capitalism isn’t going to happen lol
I have the opposite view, I think Waterson got too full of himself and produced a book that’s just not very good or interesting.
It’s about 100 words long, and in the end it’s just another example of the “watch out, learning too much is bad for you!” genre of anti-intellectual, anti-progress, anti-science stuff.
In his book Lord of Light, Roger Zelazny had Yama say this:
“It is the difference between the unknown and the unknowable, between science and fantasy—it is a matter of essence. The four points of the compass be logic, knowledge, wisdom and the unknown. Some do bow in that final direction. Others advance upon it. To bow before the one is to lose sight of the three. I may submit to the unknown, but never to the unknowable.”
And I vastly prefer that sentiment. Ignorance is not to be cherished or elevated.
I burned $20 on it based on thinking that Waterson might create a cool modern fable for adults. I wish very much I had looked at it in the bookstore first, I could have spent that $20 on something better.
It was also garbage and a waste of 18$
I don’t know if I’ll read this book, but I really enjoyed reading your take on it. I like to think I’ve been able to feel a little bit of what engaging with this book made you feel, by engaging with your post.
It always strikes me as odd the number of keyboard warriors on Reddit and elsewhere who readily look forward to societal collapse, as if it will be some tremendous moment of celebration and not a cataclysmic event resulting in millions of unnecessary death.
I’ll tell you one thing for certain, not a goddamn one of them is a Type 1 Diabetic. Yeah, capitalism and modern society aren’t perfect, but I definitely prefer it to the alternative of checks notes dying an imminent and painful death.
Lucifer’s Hammer by Pournelle and Niven has a character who is exactly that. When he realizes an apocalypse is imminent, he secures both his insulin and a series of books. Wonderful story, at least in the first two-thirds. And for the time, of course.
not a goddamn one of them is a Type 1 Diabetic
You might be surprised. Lots of people tend to not think things like that through.
Or having any kind of chronic illness.
Being an internet person that wants all of the system to collapse is definitely a form of privelege. To just assume you’d be fine and not think about the rest of humanity…
Bold of you to assume that all of us hoping for the collapse of the system are also hoping to survive it
Grow up.
Pretty sure suicidal nihilism about the state of the world is a uniquely adult trait
Are you okay
I mean, from another perspective wanting the system to just keep on keeping on while hundreds of millions are oppressed, murdered, deprived of necessities globally, and as the system hurtles us towards inevitable environmental catastrophe that will wreck everyone’s life as a result of the system, that’s also a fairly privileged position to hold.
You really just have no idea how much worse it can get, but ok
Sure, I’m just pointing out that you were also just making assumptions that you’ll be fine under the status quo without thinking about the rest of humanity. Which is a privileged position. I mean, being able to sit on the internet and pontificate about any side of this debate is really a privileged position if we’re comparing ourselves with the state of the rest of humanity.
People who want the system to collapse aren’t even doing the real work to make the status quo better, they are just lazily wishing everything would magically be better
Man, the guys who invented medical insulin knew what was up. Still crazy that shit isn’t free.
But have you considered that you dying an imminent and painful death is a necessary sacrifice for my cool dystopian aesthetic and Mad Max heroics?
Sounds pretty selfish of you, ngl
That’s where I checked out of OP’s “review”. If you actively think society collapsing is something to hope for, you are an absolute delusional moron. “Collapse aware” my ass.
“I felt keyed up and ready to fuck shit up, but I didn’t know what to throw rocks at, and so I didn’t, and in the meantime I still got bills and people I care about so I guess I’ll just keep going to work until something changes.”
Per Rule 2.1: Please conduct yourself in a civil manner.
Civil behavior is a requirement for participation in this sub. This is a warning but repeat behavior will be met with a ban.
It’s actually possible to realize that, and to count oneself among the ones that would likely suffer and/or die in many such scenarios (I sure would), and still think that ultimately, it will be a net positive for our current society to collapse, or even for the whole human race to run its course and give the planet back to the rest of the life forms that aren’t actively trying to destroy it. After all, the current way we’re doing things is also causing untold suffering and death, and it will only get worse as climate change progresses. Would I prefer that we change fundamental things about the way we function - as a society and as a species - rather than running headlong into a spectacular and brutal collapse? Sure. But people will be people, and it’s pretty clear to me that that’s not going to happen. At least after a collapse, some other species might have a fighting chance.
And of course, their ideology will be the one that springs from the ashes. Even the “winners” of societal collapse lose
That’s the strangest assumption. Just why do people think that it would be a progressive utopia after “capitalism is destroyed” or whatever they believe?
So much blind faith in thinking that
I think deep down they’re upset and in a lot of pain, and want everyone to be there with them so they feel less alone.
My theory is that a lot of their stress is existential — they live in a first-world nation where they have boring jobs, not enough money, they have hobbies they want to do but no time or energy, etc. so they dream of a world where all of those existential crises are eradicated and they just get to focus on the here and now. It’s simpler, in their minds, to live like pre-historic humans did. Little do they know, a week of that life and they’ll be crying for the luxury of being bored again
It comes from anger and disappointment towards everyone else; “how did we let this happen and do I now have to suffer an entire life of shit just so they can continue living ‘the dream’”?
So it’s a mindset of “the world is definitely gonna collapse anyway, do I at least get to watch it burn before I die, or am I just here to facilitate the suffering of the next generation?”. Nobody is looking forward to the collapse, but some people honestly don’t mind if it happens sooner so they can say ‘I told you so’.
Yeah, I know collapse is coming but I’m not looking forward to it. Once society collapses, we’re pretty much all screwed. Even if I survive, quality of life is gonna be insanely low.
Do you know a collapse is coming? Do you honestly believe that we’re on more of a precipice than we were during WW2, the Great Depression or the Civil War?
Can someone define “societal collapse” for me?
Yes.
Ya, everyone thinks they’ll be the action hero main character. Nobody thinks that – overwhelmingly more likely – they’ll get dysentery or cholera because the municipal water treatment plant went down.
I can tell you that as a Texan, when our electric grid went down in the middle of winter, and then our water became unsafe to drink, our ideas about the collapse of society changed in a matter of days. It gets very real very quickly. Especially when you can’t just leave town.
The dependable stability of the systems we depend on is a very thin veneer. One thing goes down for slightly too long and everything that depends on it starts to fall apart rather quickly.
In my area anyway, there were a lot of people helping other people, sharing food and water, heat and shelter.
In my parents more affluent area, people immediately used up all of their community reserve of propane…. To heat their pools so their equipment wouldn’t freeze.
Yeah, this was my thought, too. People who fetishize “collapse” make no sense to me.
There’s nothing fun or cathartic about panic, chaos, and the gallery of horrors that would come along with all that.
Like, you think you’re going to have time for things like books if our society collapses? You’re going to be lucky if you eat every day.
I wrote this in another comment above but I think people really romanticize the concept of “simple living”. Like all of their worries of the future and the past will go away and they can live off the land and become expert horticulturalists and farmers and hunters immediately, and all will be well and harmonious. Except it’ll be more like what you described — less harmony, more chaos
Yes, it’s really a bizarre take. It’s so easy and lazy to just say the system sucks. We all hate the system that’s no special.
But to think that it would be replaced with a better system… just why assume that? History constantly shows governments getting overthrown and replaced with worse governments (not to mention millions dying as you say)
Why do these online people think that it would be good for them if there was an apocalypse, just what on earth makes them think that?
It’s general disillusionment with and disenfranchisement from the current system, leading to a feeling to anything else will be better and a lack of understanding of how that would come about. The French Revolution led to good things afterward, but things were shockingly bad for a long time before they turned into anything good.
Delusion? I once read Walden by Thoreau and went through a phase where all I wanted was for the world to revert to its “natural state”. Then I aged out of teenagehood and realized that would not be the beautiful utopia that I fantasized about, it would just be absolute chaos
“Yay, evil society collapsed! Hey, why isn’t there water coming out of the sink?”
OP, just want to thank you for your post. You so eloquently captured a lot of how I felt reading this book. I also didn’t know about the story of its creation and am excited to delve into it. I appreciate you.