• pazukaza@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I use Ubuntu. I think it’s funny how Arch users immediately assume they know more about Linux than me because of my distro choice. My hobby is learning about Linux and I can do that perfectly from my Ubuntu machine.

    I’ve used Arch in the past, and let me tell you, nothing crazy is going on in there.

    Yes, Ubuntu sucks because they are forcing Snaps on people while snaps are slow as hell. Thankfully they haven’t fully shoved snaps down our throats. If they don’t make snaps faster before shoving them down my throat, I’ll just distro hop. Probably to Debian. I love Debian.

      • Raistlin@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Honestly I’ve found it to be surprisingly stable, and the only time the system broke, it was my own fault.

        • IriYan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve found it to be surprisingly stable

          It sounds like you have used it extensively then, because the myth is spread by people who never tried.

      • beneeney@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Arch user here. I have no idea what I’m doing. Killing Floor just crashed my graphics card or something to crash and my monitors aren’t working after reboots. Oh god

      • IriYan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Arch users HAVE to know

        They do know this is a popular myth spread around by the antiquities of debian/mint/ubuntu users who wait a few years for Arch users to locate any bugs.

    • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I went from Ubuntu to Arch and I think I’m here to stay. Ubuntu was unstable for me for some reason. I would get freezes and crashes all the time. I feel like Canonical is making things slower and bloated but I have had pretty smooth experiences with Linux mint. On Arch I’ve been getting amazing uptime. But to each ones own, if you like it, who am I to judge.

      • christophski
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m considering leaving Ubuntu. I’m currently looking at Manjaro because I don’t think I have enough time to invest in learning arch. Any tips?

        • prim3r@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          One of my favorite features of arch is the aur, and because manjaro lags behind arch releases, you can run into trouble. If you want arch without the install difficulties, I would try something like endeaver os or garuda. You’ll end up with actual arch in the end and you wont end up with some of outdated certs or whanever manjaro ucks up nowadays.

          • crunchpaste@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            While you’re absolutely correct, in my personal experience Manjaro has been perfectly stable even with somewhat heavy use of the AUR.

            • Salacian@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Mine too, but I did switch because I needed to reinstall and I would have just swiched out most of the tools that come preinstalled, to the point I didn’t know why I would even use manjaro instead of arch if I’m reinstlling everything anyway…

          • christophski
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah that sounds good to me - this is my work computer and I can’t afford it to break or to spend even half an hour of the day fixing something

        • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          People on the internet say to read the wiki and follow the directions but I’m a much more visual learner. If you follow this video, you should be all good if you want to use vanilla Arch. I do not have experience with Manjaro but one of my friends said he used it once and he enjoyed it. Though his cmos battery died and the OS bricked so he switched to Linux Mint. Installing arch might take around 30 min or an hour so it’s not the hardest thing ever. I would recommend the archinstall script but that has never worked for me, if you can manage to use that script, setup is even easier.

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=68z11VAYMS8

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-mLyrHonvU

        • notsharp@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Manjaro had a lot of dark history in past. Just use fedora workstation and chill.

    • Snickers@on.syrma.cc
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don’t get the complains about snap apps. My firefox opens near instant, even after a reboot. Maybe they fixed that with Lunar Lobster? That’s the first Ubuntu I installed on my PC since Ubuntu 9.04.

      • pazukaza@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have installed Firefox in my machine and the difference is around 3 seconds.

        For me, how my system feels is pretty important. If something isn’t snappy, my stress levels start to rise. So those 3 seconds do make a difference. Some people might not care at all, which is understandable.

        If you don’t care, use it, enjoy it. You’re free to pick what matches your priorities and preferences.

        • Snickers@on.syrma.cc
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I would care if it took 3s to start, after all I moved all my storage to NVMe for a reason. So I totally get why you would be annoyed with snaps, it’s just that in my experience there’s simply no noticeable startup time in 23.04, firefox opens in under a second. So they either fixed that in LL or you can outmuscle it with hardware, and I’m genuinely just curios which one it is.

          • pazukaza@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m inclined for the second one. It would be pretty big news if they fixed it. My hardware is not bad but it isn’t great either. I usually get laptops from my workplaces so my personal laptop is kinda old.

            Keep in mind that a lot of people use Linux exactly because they don’t have good hardware specs.