• xkforce@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Unfortunately Russia has a long history of throwing bodies at a problem until it is solved. They lost almost 30 million people in WWII and I have no doubt Putin would throw as many as he could get away with at Ukraine as was needed.

      • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        7 months ago

        I don’t think he could do 30 mil. His army is only about 3 million personnel including reservists per wikipedia, and AFU is claiming to have liquidated nearly 10% that many. Military theory is that an army loses all combat efficacy at around 30-40% casualties, and the rate of Russian casualties per day has gone up very significantly. After Russia spent all those lives in WWII, their demographics are still not what they used to be.

        Despite the fact that they’re paying troops so much to fight, it’s not clear to me that they can sustain these losses indefinitely. What we’re really seeing here is whether Putin’s “military Keynesianism” can overcome Russia’s demographic collapse. Experts are already saying Russia could not mount an invasion of this scale again for the foreseeable future.

        I think they’re going to end up as a failed state in the long run whether or not they succeed in Ukraine. The resistance would metastasize into an insurgency.

      • foggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        They had more soldiers than guns.

        Folks went into the front lines knowing the plan was to pick up guns from their dead commrades.

        • giantofthenorth@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          I think it’s important enough to note, there’s no evidence showing this was the plan in any Soviet campaign in WW2. (But this is based off memory so there could be a single digit number of times)

          In WW1? That would be accurate. Say what you will about Soviets but weapons were something they could produce and properly supply unlike the tsar.

          In the Ukraine war though you are probably correct.

          • foggy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            I’ll admit my sources are unverifiable, while strong.

            Stories from college professors. Guy was not a biased man, and was probably a fuggin mod on /r/askhistory; that type. 🤷‍♂️ Strong to me. No one listen to me. I’m drunk.

            Edit: and my general history is not iron clad; could been WWI, but it seems a prevalent story beyond my eccentric old professor.

      • andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        I loved that you got two conscripts out of your barracks instead of one when playing as Russia in Command and Conquer.

    • filoria@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      7 months ago

      Oryx is unreliable. There are numerous images of “Russian tanks” that are verified to be Ukrainian and many more “Russian tanks” that pop up as destroyed multiple times.

      This isn’t that surprising since Russia and Ukraine use the same equipment (and considering the methodology Oryx uses), but it’s very difficult to trust their numbers.