• Blackout@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think Joe was out of things to say 10 years ago. You could replace him with AI and never know the difference.

      • Riskable@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re overestimating the intelligence and ability of his listeners if you think they’d notice the difference.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean if just once it sounded not stupid they’d be calling JR a “fag” or something, I think.

    • MycoBro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t hate the man like a lot of people here but this a really good point.

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      The opposite. He never had anything to say, he was just a great interviewer.

      The problem is he started believing he had something to say, and started talking over guests he disagrees with… The last one I watched the guest spoke for less than 2 minutes before Joe went on a 5+ minute rant about how he didn’t believe it. I can’t even remember what it was about, because the guy didn’t even get to lay out his argument

      We got it Joe, you think the world is a magical place and have strong opinions on how humans should interact. Let the science man talk