• Dr. Bob@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    He tried to plea down to a misdemeanor charge, but the judge did not like the deal.

    I don’t think this is the correct framing. The judge questioned the parties (required during a deal) and found that the parties disagreed on the interpretation of the deal and exposure to additional charges (highly unusual - these agreements are typically watertight). Since there was a disagreement there was no meeting of the minds and the deal fell apart. The judges feelings have nothing to do with it.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thanks, all I remember reading was that the judge rejected the deal, but that sounds a lot more plausible than what I said.