• echo64@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    You do not need to run a big expensive awards show full of ads. It’s a reflection of your character if you choose the big expensive award show over highlighting the massive issues the industry has. If you have a platform, how you choose to use it is a reflection of you.

    If he was hired to present, sure. But this is his thing. He controls what it is and chooses the big award show funded by the big companies.

    This is the dorito Dew King, of course, so I don’t know why people expect otherwise.

    • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean he’d be foolish to mention layoffs and make enemies with publishers. He’s putting this thing together to make money for himself as well.

    • flamingarms
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      How do you know he isn’t? This feels like what happened with Kendrick Lamar during the police violence protests a few years ago in the States. NoName calls Kendrick out for not using his voice during the protests to lead people. Photos come out of him at protests, but covered up to be unrecognizable. Then years later Kendrick releases his latest album, talking about his addiction, new children, and nearly ruining his relationship, and addresses the protest thing with a song called Mirror and says “sorry I didn’t save the world, my friend, I was too busy building mine again.”

      Keighley has gone to bat for the video game industry multiple times throughout his career. He has spent a lot of energy highlighting the work of developers and what actually goes into making a game. He garnered a reputation for asking real, sometimes hard questions to AAA developers, in defense of consumers. He addressed the sexual abuse horror. How much does this dude need to do until it’s enough for us? Why are we always so determined to hang shit like this on one dude? Why are we so quick to believe that all we see is all that is happening?

      • echo64@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        it is very simple. If you have a platform, then people will look at what you choose to put on that platform. He chooses ads and things that make the large companies happy, over bringing attention to things that matter to people actually working in the industry.

        I don’t care if he does things behind the scenes, if he does, good for him. I and others are commenting about what he chooses to do with his biggest platform.

        this grandstanding about how he might theoretically be doing other stuff somewhere but you might not know, isn’t helpful.

        • flamingarms
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Mate, me asking “how much is reasonable of us to ask of one person?” is not grandstanding; that’s just me countering your point. He has used his biggest platform to address issues in the game industry before, just like you want, so my point still stands: how much is reasonable of us to ask of him? Is it his responsibility to address each issue the industry has or is it reasonable for him to pick and choose his battles?

          • echo64@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t know why you have this weird obsession with reasonableness. It has no relation. You act like I have said anything else about him.

            I’m talking about this one point, you want to make it more than that for some reason. You can have that argument with someone else.

            • flamingarms
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah, I think that’s probably best, mate, if the argument is shifting towards “why does being reasonable matter?”