Another player who was at the table during the incident sent me this meme after the problem player in question (they had a history) left the group chat.

Felt like sharing it here because I’m sure more people should keep this kind of thing in mind.

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    11 months ago

    The amount of people in this thread who assume everyone with any type of disability or difference in ability would even want to have their condition corrected is shocking. Why is it impossible to imagine a blind person who doesn’t want their vision fixed for no other reason than they believe they’re fine as is? Why is that such a difficult thing to grasp? Just because free magical heal exists doesn’t mean everyone automatically wants it. You don’t need to turn to other explanations about why it might not be trusted or affordable when you can just say “this person is blind and doesn’t particularly care to be able to see.”

    • SadCack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      I would guess that the vast amount of people with serious disabilities, paraplegic, blind, deaf, would jump at the opportunity to correct their issues.

      That would go doubley so for someone who lives in a d&d style world with far greater dangers and less accomodations than our own.

        • SadCack@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          A big part of this is that the existing technology ISN’T a magic fix. It has side effects, it works differently than traditional hearing does and this requires long periods of adjustment and learning to bear with it. Literally being able to magic your hearing back to what it naturally should be doesn’t have those significant downsides.

        • Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          This developed because it couldn’t be fixed in our world, long enough for these people to develop communities, culture, and literally their own language.

          In a world where it could always have been fixed, such communities and cultures are not likely to have ever developed, since the only people who could not get it fixed would be poor, and the poor are in a bad position to gather together in groups based on their shared experience and thus be able to form their own culture.

          Furthermore, people not wanting to be cured today exist in a world where there already are significant accomodations for their disabilities. It is not likely these people would be able to do this if our society had not made the collective decision to put in the effort needed to accommodate disabilities.

        • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          Yes, but that is because they’ve either grown up that way or have been deaf for so long that they’re fully integrated into the sub culture. In a fantasy setting, deafness would be taken care of before it could influence people culturally

          • SadCack@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            I think that disabilities would still exist, but they would be limited to the poor and lower classes who couldn’t afford the magic treatments. It really depends on how commonplace magic is and varies by the setting.

            • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              It also would depend on the disability. Deafness might be less covered, but people would be willing to save up or borrow to cure paraplegism because that prevents you from working most jobs

            • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              11 months ago

              Parents finding out their baby was deaf would probably pay to get that healed asap. And people born with hearing and later lose it are probably going to want that fixed.

              Also, your “argument” of gasp, authoritarianism!!!1! is nothing but a strawman and makes you look ridiculous

              • JackbyDev@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                11 months ago

                You’re moving the goal posts. Originally you said,

                In a fantasy setting, deafness would be taken care of before it could influence people culturally

                Now you’re saying they probably would while still taking a tone of me being wrong. You can’t agree with me that deaf people would exist while still acting like I’m wrong.

                Also, what you described earlier is akin to eugenics. Forcefully fixing alleged disabilities without consent is absolutely authoritarian.

                • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  Forcefully fixing alleged disabilities without consent is absolutely authoritarian.

                  So a parent is wrong for wanting to fix their child’s disabilities? You’re actually insane if you believe that, and I hope you never have children

                  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    That is not what you said. You’re still moving the goal posts. You said something extreme and are stepping your position back when confronted with the reality of it.

      • pomodoro_longbreak@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah but this is a game for characters who are played by people who exist in a world where that is not the case, so maybe a little sensitivity is called for.

    • CylustheVirus@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s not impossible, but it certainly seems unlikely. I’m pretty sure even someone as bad ass as Toph would prefer to be able to see. it would make life easier for her without removing any of her strength. Being blind is fuckin hard according to my visually impaired friends.

      If someone at my table wanted to play a disabled character we could have fun with it, if course.

    • EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s a big case of “I don’t like myself as I am and this person with a disability accepts themself so there must me something wrong with me; I’ll take it out on them!” Style projection

      • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        No, it’s argued agaibst because it doesn’t make any sense logistically or economically.

        And no, handwaving it away because “it’s a fantasy setting, realism doesn’t matter” is not an argument. There’s a thing called suspension of disbelief, which requires a settng to be internally consistent.

        • EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’m responding specifically to the difficulty some folks have, with understanding why a disabled person wouldn’t want to be ‘fixed’.

          • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            The issue is that in a setting with access to healing magic, you generally wouldn’t suffer from a disability long enough for it to be part of your identity

            • EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              Again, my comment wasn’t responding to the magical rpg aspect at all, just the person who doesn’t want their disability to be addressed in any way. Not a character, a real human actual person.