I also reached out to them on Twitter but they directed me to this form. I followed up with them on Twitter with what happened in this screenshot but they are now ignoring me.

  • stom@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Im not attempting to “gatekeep” anything. I’m pointing out that drawing a parallel between a keyword-based chat it script and a full LLM is disingenuous.

    • force@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Wdym drawing a parallel? I literally never did that lol, I just said it’s AI even if it’s not LLM-level AI despite “just being a bunch of if statements”. They don’t have to be the same complexity in order to be in the same grouping. My original comment was exactly “it is an AI tho”, I didn’t say or imply “it’s an advanced neural network capable of taking on the greatest of commercial LLMs”

      • stom@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        You’re totally, technically correct and I apologise :)

        Reading this back it seems I’ve had a kneejerk reaction to seeing the word “AI” slapped onto a basic chatbot. I appreciate that yes, by all metrics it’s an AI - yet it draws a parallel between this kind of Hello-World chat-bot and the current state of AI, which I felt is misleading. Like comparing a canoe to a cruise ship, you know?