• nitrolife@rekabu.ru
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      10 个月前

      Thanks. Not full wayland protocol support and have a bugs, but something is greater than nothing. UPD: The utilization of the Internet channel has also increased

      • arc@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 个月前

        If you look at any modern desktop application, e.g. those built over GTK or QT, then they’re basically rendering stuff into a pixmap and pushing it over the wire. All of the drawing primitives made X11 efficient once upon a time are useless, obsolete junk, completely inadequate for a modern experience. Instead, X11 is pushing big fat pixmaps around and it is not efficient at all.

        So I doubt it makes any difference to bandwidth except in a positive sense. I bet if you ran a Wayland desktop over RDP it would be more efficient than X11 forwarding. Not familiar with waypipe but it seems more like a proxy between a server and a client so it’s probably more dependent on the client’s use/abuse of calls to the server than RDP is when implemented by a server.

      • LeFantome@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 个月前

        What kind of bugs are you running into? The original Waypipe proposal claimed that it was pushing less data than X. Let’s hope it gets faster in the future.

        • nitrolife@rekabu.ru
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 个月前

          Short command wasn’t work in my env. I can run only with full sockets path. May be I do something wrong.