• Veneroso@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    If you follow the constitution, the right to bear arms is for a well regulated militia. Not for a stressed 18 year old buying an AR-15 at Walmart to shoot up rioters from another state.

    • SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yes totally forgot about that the people part…go read some federalist papers and a few history books the 2nd is for the people not the militia.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      You might not like where that logic goes. The Supreme Court took a stance in United States v. Miller (1939) that the NFA’s provisions on short barreled shotguns could be enforced on the basis that it’s not a weapon that would be used by a well-regulated militia.

      That brings us to a conclusion that literally nobody likes. The government could ban shorty shotguns and .22 rimfire, because those aren’t militia weapons. It could not ban fully automatic weapons or even rocket launchers.