• TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      You can patent things made with software, just not the software algorithms themselves.

      I understand that it’s possible, but I don’t understand why, legally speaking, a distinction is made. US courts don’t seem to know either as they use the same argument that you gave (software is math), except they allow complicated software to be patented.

      Also, funny you should mention drugs…

      Crucially, the article mentions that drug patents would still be strongly enforced in the EU, Japan, and the US. It’s great that India is making drugs more accessible, but I don’t see how it’s relevant to the differences in hardware and software for patentability.

      • irmoz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        I don’t understand why, legally speaking, a distinction is made.

        You don’t understand why the law distinguishes between a piece of digital art and Photoshop itself? Come on, dude.