EDIT: Let’s cool it with the downvotes, dudes. We’re not out to cut funding to your black hole detection chamber or revoke the degrees of chiropractors just because a couple of us don’t believe in it, okay? Chill out, participate with the prompt and continue with having a nice day. I’m sure almost everybody has something to add.

  • LanternEverywhere@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    Great example, and this brings up a great point about this topic - there’s a difference between what’s a scientific pursuit vs. what is current established scientific understanding.

    Dark matter is a topic being studied to try to find evidence of it existing, but as of now there’s is zero physical evidence that it actually exists.

      • doctorcrimson@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        Proof of gravity from an unknown source affecting an object isn’t indicative of that source’s characteristics, though.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          I mean yeah that’s why it’s called dark matter. Because we know nothing about it except that it has gravity and doesn’t interact much (if at all) with electromagnetic waves.