• ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    11 months ago

    The best way to reduce harm with this drug to users and the planet is to get rid of the deadly impurities and high cost.

    • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Removing impurities is really tricky, but that said, it’s not like industry grade equipment and operations are being used here to manufacture it. There may be a simple step or two that would help significantly reduce impurities.

      Your comment also made me realize for the first time, a lot of these illicit drugs are made by hobbyists, so to speak, not professional manufacturers. Just knowledge isn’t enough, and I say that as a chemical engineer. If I tried to synthesize anything at home it would have a high degree of impurity – even if I bought some nice lab equipment.

      There’s probably a lot of benefit in having the government subsidize a pharma company to make high purity drugs. The impurities could be responsible for a lot of side effects.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        I bet many go out of their way to avoid getting proper equipment because those purchases can get them on a list. It’s legally safer to produce sketchy shit, and since you’re breaking the law anyways, who cares if what you’re selling is really what you say it is.

        Profit comes from volume, you can take the risk of selling to as many people as possible or you can inflate your volume with other cheaper shit and never even consider the bit of powder that remained in a lethal dose-sized clump as you mixed it.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      That’s like saying that the best way to reduce harm from alcohol is to make good strong alcohol cheap so people wouldn’t drink eau-de-cologne and denaturate.

      Problems with alcohol are not limited to it sometimes being mixed with poison.

      Problems with cocaine didn’t start with it becoming illegal.

      Let’s please not talk as if it’s normal to consume it.

      EDIT: That said, I do sometimes consume alcohol.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Let’s put it this way:

          I have a few relatives believing in folk medicine,

          a few other relatives believing in good holy USSR unfairly taken from us by evil fate,

          a friend believing in esoterics,

          a friend and a relative with alcoholism problems,

          an acquaintance doing prostitution,

          and some acquaintances believing in Russian neo-paganism (very far from actual Russian paganism) with all the history freakery attached,

          and probably I’d know some blowing coke if it weren’t a thing best kept secret here due to inhumane laws.

          That doesn’t mean any of those things are normal.

          • Allero@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            You brought quite a lot of things together, and I’d say they should be addressed separately if you want to get your message across.

            On my part, for example - USSR wasn’t holy, but its demise instead of improvement is a giant tradegy that still negatively echoes in the world history.

            Someone else would say there’s nothing wrong with prostitution, for example.

            Some would point out folk medicine is not all entirely wrong even by medical science standards and it becomes a problem when patients ignore science in favor of unproven methods.

            And at the end of it, you end up with the comment that is half wrong, and the message poorly sent.

            That’s just my 2 cents here.

            • deafboy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              What the actual fuck are you talking about? The fall of USSR was the second best thing that ever happened to the country I was born in. The first was the end of nazi occupation. Although the negative consequences are still echoing through the entire eastern block.

              • Allero@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                As I said - USSR was by no means holy, and some regions, particularly forcefully occupied states of Eastern Europe, gained quite a lot from its downfall.

                I’m talking about a more global effect, particularly economic and political pressure USSR exerted on major capitalist powers. It was a simple sign: “the policies we implement do work, your workers can and will demand them, and you better do it or the same revolution will strip you out of all your riches”.

                Pretty much since its inception, USSR was able to literally shift global policies regarding working conditions and universally available services. It’s after severe protests in pre-Nazi Germany and USSR that all major powers suddenly decided to shorten the work day from 10-12 hours to 8, then from 6 days a week to 5, introduced (except for US) full universal healthcare and higher edication, and many more policies we take for granted today.

                Then, when USSR went into its demise, the improvements stopped. The income inequality rose significantly in most major economies, going straight up through the roof in the US, UK, Canada and Germany. Same happened to the post-Soviet countries themselves, even though it has been at first greatly compensated by the sheer volume of money coming from foreign investors. Social services started to receive less funding, and population is more in debt than ever.

                If anything, USSR was the force that kept major powers in check and didn’t allow capitalism to do what it does best - concentrate wealth, population be damned. I know capitalism can look like magic when your country has got significant economic boost in living memory, but global trends show a very different picture.

                • deafboy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  It’s after severe protests in pre-Nazi Germany and USSR that all major powers suddenly decided to shorten the work day from 10-12 hours to 8

                  Some industries in the west has been adopting the 10 or 8 hour working day even before the soviet union has existed. And this is going to be only my personal speculations, but as the nature of the work itself has been changing over time, so did the time requirements.

                  from 6 days a week to 5

                  It’s funny that you mention that, because one thing that I distinctly remember from what my parents and grandparents has been telling me about the previous regime was something called “working saturday of honor”, when the workers were mandated to come work an extra day. Some of them were to compensate for the state holidays, some just to ramp up the productivity.

            • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              On my part, for example - USSR wasn’t holy, but its demise instead of improvement is a giant tradegy that still negatively echoes in the world history.

              I agree, but that’s not the position I described.

              Someone else would say there’s nothing wrong with prostitution, for example.

              Definitely better than alcoholism.

              Some would point out folk medicine is not all entirely wrong even by medical science standards and it becomes a problem when patients ignore science in favor of unproven methods.

              The latter is what I meant exactly.

              And at the end of it, you end up with the comment that is half wrong, and the message poorly sent.

              That depends on reader’s interpretation, so you are basically ascribing your own choices to me. If something isn’t clear, it doesn’t mean you can pick the wrong variant and ascribe it to author of that comment. It just means you can ask.