Stamets@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 1 year agoThe dreamlemmy.worldimagemessage-square250fedilinkarrow-up11.97Karrow-down143
arrow-up11.93Karrow-down1imageThe dreamlemmy.worldStamets@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 1 year agomessage-square250fedilink
minus-squareTheGreenGolem@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoGlorified chatbots. Tops. But definitely not something with any kind of intelligence.
minus-squareParetoOptimalDev@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-21 year agoYesterday I prompted gpt4 to convert a power shell script to Haskell. It did it in one shot. This happens more and more frequently for me. I don’t want to oversell llms, but you are definitely underselling them.
minus-squareschmidtster@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down3·1 year agoIs that not a type of AI already?
minus-squarelad@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·1 year agoWell, there’s an argument over not calling machine learning AI in this very thread, so… ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
minus-squareschmidtster@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoSo why suggest it for the catch all term for AI when it’s only one portion of the argument itself? Such a strange suggestion,
Machine learning?
Glorified chatbots. Tops. But definitely not something with any kind of intelligence.
Yesterday I prompted gpt4 to convert a power shell script to Haskell. It did it in one shot. This happens more and more frequently for me.
I don’t want to oversell llms, but you are definitely underselling them.
Is that not a type of AI already?
Well, there’s an argument over not calling machine learning AI in this very thread, so… ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
So why suggest it for the catch all term for AI when it’s only one portion of the argument itself? Such a strange suggestion,