cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/1468725

Your thoughts?

I really liked the section of the video titled “CPU” 'cause it actually explained everything well and used sketch-noting or whatever you call it (I’m referring to the graphs here).

  • samc
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    I guess the argument would be that software fixes need to be implemented for each ROM separately. Which also involves the pain of decompiling. Yes FPGAs are probably a pain, but they potentially offer perfect emulation of every game.

    One thing I’m not sure about is how portable FPGA logic is. If I write a NES emulator in verilog for one FPGA, can that code be reused on a later model if, for example, my FPGA goes out of production?

    • Dotcom@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      There’s also an argument to be made for preserving the “hardware” - those machines don’t last forever. the Analouge guys recently made (or are making?) an FPGA that is compatible with all of the Turbografix hardware paraphernalia which is arguably just as important as the actual software