• partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Then please complete your argument. One person is contributing money into the equity of the house without ownership, and I believe you’re arguing that is unfair, because the homeowner its benefiting.

      What actions are you proposing is fair to the non-homeowner that doesn’t make it unfair to the homeowner?

      • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        My argument is complete. Feel free to read the other ten replies where I address the same comment

        • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You and I are conversing and you want me to chase your other conversations with other people? I think you’ve overestimated my interest in what I believe is your flawed argument. I guess we’re done then. Have a nice day!

            • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Sorry, I’m not following everyone else’s conversations. I can’t speak to what others are saying. You seem to be comfortable aggregating the conversations and expecting others to do the same, so I can see why you have that response. Clearly we’re at the end of productive conversation. You’re welcome to continue replying if you like, but I won’t be reading your responses.

              • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m responding to ten people, sorry I can’t hold your hand and carefully caress your condescending replies.