• riodoro1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    6 months ago

    Hey, maybe less humans means more climate. We haven’t tried that one yet.

    • cyberpunk007@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      No comment replies to you, but all the down votes. I’m curious what their take is on this.

    • Neato@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      Less humans mean less innovation. It means less energy and then less emissions total, but that’s irrelevant long term. Without enough labor to support industry growth and technology, we’ll be more on the sustaining ourselves side of labor. Which means we’re far more likely to relapse into fossil fuels. Especially if the depopulation is rapid which will destabilize industries.