• Jax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hatred is a strong assumption based on what I’ve said, especially because I’m simply using them as an example.

    Acting like xbox live is the only reason online gaming costs money is silly.

    • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Bethesda brought microtransactions with horse armor.

      Microsoft did online subscriptions for online functionality on consoles. I don’t know why you think it’s silly, they were the first to do it. If things had gone different, it could have been Sega.

      • Jax@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        No what I think is silly is the suggestion that somehow being first to the punch makes them responsible… It’s not like the other console makers went “Well, that’s just silly, we don’t need the infinite cash flow that this brings in! That’s nonsense.”

        What you hate is capitalism, Microsoft is just a name.