• GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    In my opinion it depends more on whom you are stealing from than what. Food is okay, anything else not absolutely required for immediate survival isn’t is a somewhat cruel and arbitrary position.

    Even a dirt poor person has more needs than just food sometimes, to stick with your example even a dirt poor woman or girl may want to feel pretty for a moment, and I feel that’s nothing bad either. Granted this is a slippery slope to outright lawlessness, but there certainly is a lot of room for valid needs that are less immediate than nourishment and shelter, but still important to people feeling human at all. Counts twice for people already in the extremely dehumanizing position of being poor.

    • can@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      60
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      She may need it for an interview to improve her prospects too. As long as it’s from a big place like Walmart I see no harm in someone desperate doing it to improve their situation.

      The Walton family will be fine.

    • 𝕾𝖕𝖎𝖈𝖞 𝕿𝖚𝖓𝖆@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      11 months ago

      My policy has become: “If you see someone shoplifting, no you didn’t.” All businesses write a little bit of theft loss into their budgets. I don’t care what shoplifters take. It’s not my concern. Let the egg heads in accounting and the beef sticks in loss prevention figure it out. That’s what they’re paid to do. Not you.

      • AmberPrince@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Mines a bit different, but similar. “If you see someone shoplifting, no you didn’t” only applies to chain stores. Walmart? Fuck 'em. Target? Get all you can. Local boutique store downtown? The fuck is wrong with you, go steal from a corporation that deserves it.

        • Th4tGuyII@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          This is a really good caveat - if you’re going to take, take from those who can afford it the most, not the small-time local shops

      • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        11 months ago

        If you’re gonna cut staff and build a giant bank of self check kiosks instead, then I consider it a perk of my temporary employment at the checkout line. I’ll take pork chops and veggies in lieu of a paycheck thanks

        • Chobbes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          11 months ago

          Even if you’re not trying to steal from the self checkout half the time they don’t even have the item in the database… Like I’m not paying for a dozen doughnuts when that’s the only option, but I got one… so I guess it’s a roll now…?

      • Chobbes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        I think I might have cared in the past because “it’s against the law” but I’ve grown up and don’t care about that at all anymore… My opinion on shoplifting is now just “why would I even care?” I wouldn’t do it personally, but I have no problem with other people stealing shit (especially shit they need to live and thrive) from a soulless corporation. I wouldn’t be happy if they mugged a random person… But Target? Why would I care?