Engine maker Cummins Inc. will recall 600,000 Ram trucks as part of a settlement with federal and California authorities that also requires the company to remedy environmental damage caused by illegal software that let it skirt diesel emissions tests.

New details of the settlement, reached in December, were released Wednesday. Cummins had already agreed to a $1.675 billion civil penalty to settle claims – the largest ever secured under the Clean Air Act – plus $325 million for pollution remedies.

That brings Cummins’ total penalty to more than $2 billion, which officials from the Justice Department, Environmental Protection Agency, California Air Resources Board and the California Attorney General called “landmark” in a call with reporters Wednesday.

    • Dem Bosain@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      6 months ago

      I don’t see how it could NOT affect power output.

      But the thing about recalls is they’re completely voluntary. You don’t have to bring your truck in to have it fixed.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        51
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        And these are Ram drivers. Like a quarter of them have probably already modified their pavement princess to roll coal.

              • n2burns@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                They didn’t say “smart”. The bar for being able to pass inspection on your vehicle is pretty low!

                • highenergyphysics@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  16
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Ah this must be the incredible conservative business acumen I keep hearing about

                  That’s nice sweetie, now let’s get you back to church where you can foam at the mouth and rave about other mens genitals all you want

                  • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    Yes, but being able to remove the douchebag tune from your truck long enough to pass emissions requires mechanical ability, not parking acumen, so your response just looks silly.

                    And that’s what is done in states that have yearly emissions tests. There’s probably a setting for it in the tuner.

                • LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  Yes, CA definitely doesn’t scamln the ECU and force you to have driven a set distance to set the ECU. And it’s definitely not a common issue even for enthusiasts using legal mods. Definitely no chance.

            • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              Every year in states that have safety and emissions testing, you have to bring your vehicle in to be inspected before you can renew your license plate/window tags to be registered to drive on the road. If you fail inspection, you need to remedy the issue and get tested again. You can’t drive the vehicle without registration, so you have to correct it or risk fines for driving with expired registration. Inspections are usually $5-15 in most states.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Inspection stations in California will probably check the recall status so that will at least cover that for the State concerned by it.

      • The Pantser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        6 months ago

        Sure would be nice if we had a federal vehicle emissions test or even just a safety inspection. At least for federally owned roads.

      • bluGill@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        If your bring your truck in to a dealer the dealer often will automatically apply all recalls. Cummins can also get third party mechanics involved. While the dealer or mechanic knows their customer doesn’t want this recall applied, they also have various other legal issues that are even more important - dealers may risk their entire dealership if they get caught not applying this recall.

        That these vehicles are recalled can also be tracked other ways. If governments really care they will not renew your license without proof that the recall was applied. (I don’t think they have ever done this but is in their power)

        • Dem Bosain@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          EPA only requires recall tracking for 18 months. After that they give up. Also:

          …we (EPA) may inspect or test the engines/equipment only if the purchaser permits it, or if state or local inspection programs separately provide for it.

          Enforcement of emissions regulations are very reliant on state inspection programs, and not every state has an inspection program.

          In this case, Cummins would only contract with outside mechanics if dealers were unable to handle the volume or modifications. If an owner brings their vehicle to a third-party, Cummins is still responsible for paying for the fix. But in this case the fix seems to be an update to the ECU, which is generally only accomplished at a dealer.

          Driver licensing/vehicle registration is handled by the states, and would only be in jeopardy if a state has an inspection program.

          The EPA reserves the right to extend a recall program, and in this case the publicity certainly warrants it. But aside from living in a CARB state or having to pass a different inspection, there’s no enforcement of recall compliance.

      • Car@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        Unlikely. That would require adding in significant sound deadening to almost the entire engine bay and restricting exhausts more than they already are with diesel particulate filters and cats. If you ever check out the car audio enthusiasts, you can see they easily spend a few thousand applying deadening materials to their vehicles and increasing their weight to boot.

        • The Pantser@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 months ago

          We can’t move to electric any faster. I hate loud engines. Then you have the trifecta, loud engines, loud exhaust, and booming sound systems. And cops don’t give a shit but shit is falling off my walls when they drive by or I feel ill when sitting next to them at a red light.

          • Car@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            I feel you. Noise pollution is bad in some places. You have to play your music really loud for it to bother people next to you.

    • Car@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 months ago

      Don’t see how it could be any other way.

      If Cummins could manufacture and sell compliant engines which met performance goals and customer expectations, they would. Writing has been on the wall for tampering with diesel engine emissions in the US for a while now.